FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective

Posted By: Zheka

FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/02/22 18:27

If no parameter combination produces a 'positive' value for objective in a specific WFO cycle, i would like to skip trades in the oos test period for such cycle.

This is probably possible to achieve by parsing the objective from .par files and then determining whether to trade or not, but having such functionality out-of-the-box would be very helpful.

Thank you.
Posted By: jcl

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/03/22 06:25

Rather than parsing .par files, store and read the objectives with putvar / getvar. There is also an undocumented variable "ObjectiveLong" and "ObjectiveShort", but since it's undocumented I don't know if it does exactly what you want.
Posted By: Zheka

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/03/22 12:27

Isn't this useful broadly enough to warrant adding to Zorro's out-of-the-box (or even default) functionality?
Posted By: jcl

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/03/22 12:40

I have no idea for what it could be useful. But we will still implement it when it is backed by other users.
Posted By: Zheka

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/03/22 14:09

Then, what's your conceptual thinking on the subject?

Why do you think this is irrelevant?
Posted By: Grant

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective - 06/03/22 14:56

I like the idea of this 'penalty' method and it might result in a better alpha, provided that you use wide parameter ranges.
© 2024 lite-C Forums