It should be removed because you disagree? Very fair reasoning Mister PHeMoX.
No, I don't disagree, I just think it's a
pointless thread. You're basically complaining about a. the obvious if you agree and b. complaining about how someone else ventilated their opinion or responded to said opinion.
I don't quite understand why if someone responds directly to someone's picture in a rather blunt (and perhaps insulting) way that people make a fuss about a mod banning him. ESPECIALLY when they actually agree with the ban! In my book that's nuts!
Anyways, I simply responded the way I did, because true neutrality is somewhat dictatorial in nature (true neutrality as in the mod banning the guy because the forum rules state so). But I've got a feeling you wouldn't quite understand.
Offline swearing is generally a lack of discipline in sustaining your emotions. It's a weakness, and shows you're not capable of expressing your position properly with common words. Swearing is the easy way out
A shrink would totally disagree with that! Anger is an emotion, you're assuming being angry is bad, while swearing is a way to ventilate and get rid of a part of that emotion, a part of the anger. The mere fact that it's an emotional response makes it human and normal. Swearing isn't meant to explain anger, it's meant to ventilate or release the mental pressure!
Of course fixing the issue at hand will totally solve the problem, but swearing has it's use.
Only people who swear all the time without actually being angry are probably abnormal, but they are only weak in not being able to break their own weird habit of using swearing the wrong way. Also, some people swear out of pure excitement, which isn't necessarily false. This also releases a similar kind of mental pressure.
The use of things like swearing are often culturally defined and there is no true right or wrong.