0 registered members (),
1,498
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Why C++
[Re: Alberto]
#84808
08/06/06 16:06
08/06/06 16:06
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,234 Wisconsin USA
FoxHound
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,234
Wisconsin USA
|
C++ is faster then C-script.
On top of that there are things that simply can not be done in c-script, like accessing dirextx functions.
--------------------- There is no signature here.
QUIT LOOKING FOR ONE!
|
|
|
Re: Why C++
[Re: Damocles]
#84810
08/06/06 16:46
08/06/06 16:46
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,439 Red Dwarf
Michael_Schwarz
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,439
Red Dwarf
|
And C++ is (waaaaaaaay) MUCH more powerful than C-Script
"Sometimes JCL reminds me of Notch, but more competent" ~ Kiyaku
|
|
|
Re: Why C++
[Re: Michael_Schwarz]
#84811
08/06/06 16:59
08/06/06 16:59
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,305
Damocles
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,305
|
No, it is not better in all cases, it is just more usefull for certain approaches/solutions that cant be realized in c-scipt, or grow to complicated. (Multiplayer, complex object orented systems, grafical calculations..)
There are many tasks that can be realized more efficiently in c-scipt for the usual 3dGS User.
There was a comment I remember about an old Amiga Assebler Book, where to author states, that the more proficient one is in assebmler, the less he uses it. -> It is only used for program parts that need to be fast (calculations in a loop), or cant be realized in Basic or C. All other processing, that needs no special speed are done in a higher language.
|
|
|
Re: Why C++
[Re: TWO]
#84815
08/23/06 16:50
08/23/06 16:50
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,439 Red Dwarf
Michael_Schwarz
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,439
Red Dwarf
|
wouldnt it be
DLLFUNC var Add_one_to_var(var variable) { _INT(variable)+=1; }
?
"Sometimes JCL reminds me of Notch, but more competent" ~ Kiyaku
|
|
|
|