I know, this has been harped at on many occasions, but I'm not asking for a specific time when Lite-C is going to be C++ based. Oops! I just ruined this whole post. Oh well.
But seriously, is Lite-C going to support all of the C++ language features eventually, and not just classes and unions?
Code:
void main()
{
cout << "I am MrCode,";
cout << "hear me roar!";
system("PAUSE");
}
Re: Classes and more?
[Re: MrCode]
#170403 12/01/0710:4812/01/0710:48
When you want C++ why dont you use VC++ Express, its free? It does not make much sense to me that lite-C supports C++ when you can also use VC++ Express when you wnt programming in C++.
Re: Classes and more?
[Re: Spirit]
#170404 12/01/0714:5012/01/0714:50
Actually, my question was more based on lostclimate's idea. I still want to use Lite-C the way it is, but with C++ language features. I'm not saying I want to switch to development with C++.
Code:
void main()
{
cout << "I am MrCode,";
cout << "hear me roar!";
system("PAUSE");
}
Re: Classes and more?
[Re: MrCode]
#170406 12/03/0709:4112/03/0709:41
Well, class functionality would be great, considering most of the current programming languages are aiming at OO. This would also decrease development time (in programming that is) dramaticly. But as it is a scripting language and as it is supposed to be very light I reckon classes will not be implemented. So the C# wrapper will be perfect for me
BASIC programmers never die, they GOSUB and don't RETURN.
