Hilbert's Hotel

Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum...
Discussing Infinity: theism and atheism, prime numbers, immortality, cosmology, philosophy...

Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
AlpacaZorroPlugin v1.3.0 Released
by kzhao. 05/22/24 13:41
Free Live Data for Zorro with Paper Trading?
by AbrahamR. 05/18/24 13:28
Change chart colours
by 7th_zorro. 05/11/24 09:25
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
The Bible Game
A psychological thriller game
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Who's Online Now
3 registered members (AndrewAMD, Akow, 1 invisible), 1,417 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
AemStones, LucasJoshua, Baklazhan, Hanky27, firatv
19055 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 10 11
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Kinji_2007] #117370
03/15/07 04:10
03/15/07 04:10
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
Quote:

There are several other documents that mention Jesus if you need "non-christian" reading material.




Well, you'd need to check your sources and do some more research, because all that those mention is the surname 'jesus', which was very common back then. According to biblical scholars (!) phrases like '..of nazareth' in certain scriptures about 'sources' were added at a later time(!).

It's a bit like saying you've found a diary of someone called John in the United States and claim it thus must have been John F. Kennedy's. Eventhough even in the very same town where you've actually found it there could have lived many many other Johns...

Quote:

If you do not believe in God and you still guide your life according to the Bible then you will be remembered as a better man.




I think everyone who's sane and relatively normal knows how to live a good life and be a good person and understands all those moral values and ultimately doesn't quite need the bible for all that.

Quote:

Not saying salvation is yours.. just saying that there is nothing wrong with living up to Bible standards as best as possible.




Is it wrong not to believe at all in your opinion? Salvation by the way, is just another uncertain uncertainty of this big list of promises religions in general tend to provide.

Quote:

except that my main gripe is with people who make rather egregious mistakes because they're so wound up about proving the bible is errant, that they can't just admit that not everything they think is an error, actually is an error. But what are you gonna do?




It's tempting to ask for an example, but in your view there probably must be many cases, so I guess this would result in a futile attempt of trying to understand and probably make the entire discussion go right back to square one. Comments like yours are a bit too easy to make without backing them up though,

Cheers


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: PHeMoX] #117371
03/15/07 04:37
03/15/07 04:37
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,682
Coppell, Texas
Ran Man Offline
Expert
Ran Man  Offline
Expert

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,682
Coppell, Texas
All I have to say about this subject is at the link below:

http://www.noahsadventures.com/downloads/godany3.wav




Cougar Interactive

www.zoorace.com
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Irish_Farmer] #117372
03/15/07 09:02
03/15/07 09:02
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline OP

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline OP

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Quote:

Don't have much to add, except that my main gripe is with people who make rather egregious mistakes because they're so wound up about proving the bible is errant, that they can't just admit that not everything they think is an error, actually is an error. But what are you gonna do?



I do not intend to prove that the bible is errant. The bible is not more errant than Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'. It only becomes errant when you misunderstand it as a historic, geographic, or scientific record. The error is in the interpretation, not in the bible.

Quote:

I was under the impression that the "babylonian" influence idea had been left for dead.
My initial objection is that throughout history, the Hebrews had strong national pride and went through great pains to avoid any influence from outside cultures.



Your impression is wrong, but national pride was just the reason for the writing of Genesis 1. Its author, identified by historians as "P" because he was probably a priest, wanted a Hebrew creation story to stand out against the all-known Babylonian myth, which told that Marduk separated the waters. So the sentence:

"So God made the expanse and separated the water under the expanse from the water above it."

probably just means: 'it wasn't Marduk; it was our Hebrew god'.

Now you see the problem of apologetics: when attempting to adapt bible sentences to today's science, you must utterly change their meaning. Originally the sentence just told that the world was full of water and God - or Marduk - split the water for creating a dry place inside. All the apologetic "explanations" - clouds, lower atmosphere, a canopy - are not contained in this sentence, and must be artificially interpreted into it.

It's a little ironic that just the apologists who claim to take the bible literally wildly re-interpret it in contradiction to its literal meaning. If they are right that a hell exists, they'll probably end up there for this .

Re: Bible apologetics [Re: jcl] #117373
03/15/07 09:53
03/15/07 09:53
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
K
Kinji_2007 Offline
Member
Kinji_2007  Offline
Member
K

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
"Well, you'd need to check your sources and do some more research, because all that those mention is the surname 'jesus', which was very common back then."

Its hard not to know who these talk about. Here is a few.. C+P

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?, a Jewish historian) mentions John the Baptist and Herod - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 5, par. 2

"Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness."

Note: There is dispute as to the reliability of the Josephus accounts. However, there is no textual/manuscript reason for doubting them since the extant Greek manuscripts all agree with the texts in question; namely, the quotes shown on this page. However, the reason the quotes are in doubt is because of the text in italics in the various quotes; they seem a little too favorable regarding Christ. Also, it appears that the writings of Josephus were transmitted to us through the Christian community.

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Jesus - Antiquities, Book 18, ch. 3, par. 3.

Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man; for he was a doer of wonderful works, a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, (9) those that loved him at the first did not forsake him; for he appeared to them alive again the third day; (10) as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

There is debate among scholars as to the authenticity of this quote since it is so favorable to Jesus. For an examination of this please see Regarding the quotes from the historian Josephus about Jesus.

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions James, the brother of Jesus - Antiquities, Book 20, ch. 19.

"Festus was now dead, and Albinus was but upon the road; so he assembled the sanhedrim of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions]; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done."

Flavius Josephus (AD 37?-101?) mentions Ananias the High Priest who was mentioned in Acts 23:2

Now as soon as Albinus was come to the city of Jerusalem, he used all his endeavors and care that the country might be kept in peace, and this by destroying many of the Sicarii. But as for the high priest, Ananias (25) he increased in glory every day, and this to a great degree, and had obtained the favor and esteem of the citizens in a signal manner; for he was a great hoarder up of money

Acts 23:2, "And the high priest Ananias commanded those standing beside him to strike him [Paul] on the mouth."

Tacitus (A.D. c.55-A.D. c.117, Roman historian) mentions "christus" who is Jesus - Annals

"Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular."

Ref. from http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/annals.mb.txt

Thallus Circa AD 52, eclipse of the sun. Thallus wrote a history of the Eastern Mediterranean world from the Trojan War to his own time. His writings are only found as citations by others. Julius Africanus who wrote about AD 221 mentioned Thallus' account of an eclipse of the sun.

"On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun."

Is this a reference to the eclipse at the crucifixion? Luke 23:44-45, "And it was now about the sixth hour, and darkness fell over the whole land until the ninth hour, 45 the sun being obscured; and the veil of the temple was torn in two."

The oddity is that Jesus' crucifixion occurred at the Passover which was a full moon. It is not possible for a solar eclipse to occur at a full moon. Note that Julius Africanus draws the conclusion that Thallus' mentioning of the eclipse was describing the one at Jesus' crucifixion. It may not have been.

Julius Africanus, Extant Writings, XVIII in the Ante–Nicene Fathers, ed. by Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1973), vol. VI, p. 130. as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Pliny the Younger mentioned Christ. Pliny was governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. Pliny wrote ten books. The tenth around AD 112.

"They (the Christians) were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food—but food of an ordinary and innocent kind."

Pliny, Letters, transl. by William Melmoth, rev. by W.M.L. Hutchinson (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1935), vol. II, X:96 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

The Talmud

"On the eve of the Passover Yeshu was hanged. For forty days before the execution took place, a herald went forth and cried, "He is going forth to be stoned because he has practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy. Any one who can say anything in his favor, let him come forward and plead on his behalf." But since nothing was brought forward in his favor he was hanged on the eve of the Passover!"

Gal. 3:13, "Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree."

Luke 22:1, "Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which is called the Passover, was approaching. 2And the chief priests and the scribes were seeking how they might put Him to death; for they were afraid of the people."

This quotation was taken from the reading in The Babylonian Talmud, transl. by I. Epstein (London: Soncino, 1935), vol. III, Sanhedrin 43a, p. 281 as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Lucian (circa 120-after 180) mentions Jesus. Greek writer and rhetorician.

"The Christians, you know, worship a man to this day—the distinguished personage who introduced their novel rites, and was crucified on that account. . . . You see, these misguided creatures start with the general conviction that they are immortal for all time, which explains the contempt of death and voluntary self-devotion which are so common among them; and then it was impressed on them by their original lawgiver that they are all brothers, from the moment that they are converted, and deny the gods of Greece, and worship the crucified sage, and live after his laws. All this they take quite on faith, with the result that they despise all worldly goods alike, regarding them merely as common property."

Lucian, The Death of Peregrine, 11–13, in The Works of Lucian of Samosata, transl. by H.W. Fowler and F.G. Fowler, 4 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon, 1949), vol. 4, as cited in Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.

Though Lucian opposed Christianity, he acknowledges Jesus, that Jesus was crucified, that Christians worship him, and that this was done by faith.

___________________
Sources

McDowell, Josh, Evidence that Demands a Verdict, San Bernardino, CA, Here's Life Publishers, Inc. 1979.
Habermas, Gary R., The Historical Jesus: Ancient Evidence for the Life of Christ, (Joplin, MO: College Press Publishing Company) 1996.
Encarta on the Web at http://encarta.msn.com .


My conclusion: Jesus lived and died as explained in the Bible. What happened after his death is left up to faith. :-)

Last edited by Kinji_2007; 03/15/07 09:59.

http://www.geocities.com/carapacedweller/kinjis/Tutorial_Index.html A5 and A6 tutorials <> E3S series "Show me once and I got it, tell me once and I'll think twice."
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: PHeMoX] #117374
03/15/07 10:43
03/15/07 10:43
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
K
Kinji_2007 Offline
Member
Kinji_2007  Offline
Member
K

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
Quote:

I think everyone who's sane and relatively normal knows how to live a good life and be a good person and understands all those moral values and ultimately doesn't quite need the bible for all that.





Only saying that if you take a "good" man and watch as he applies the principles in the Bible.. he will be a better man. Much better.

Quote:

Is it wrong not to believe at all in your opinion?




There are so many choices in life.. we make them every day. The Bible is one of those things that is limited to a simple set of answers.

1) Believe
2) Do not believe

I can't say whether your right or wrong for not believeing because my personal belief is based on faith. I can however tell you what what it says will happen to those that do not believe.

If you need proof, do this: Find a way in your heart to believe. Devote your life and when in need, call on him. Watch as things take place in your life that you cannot explain and there is your proof. Ill share a few instances that I find hard to explain.

When I was younger.. about 16-17 years ago I was at the church praying on a week night. At the time I had no vehicle and my plans was to save the world. In my mind I shouldnt have been thinking of material things but I couldnt help it. I really needed a car. Drive to work at McDonalds, drive to church.. and so on. I starting asking for a car. Before the prayer meeting was over someone interupted me aqnd said I had a phone call. My mother wanted to inform me that she had found me a car and it was at the house waiting on me. You would have to know my mother to know how odd that is. I gave thanks and counted this as a blessing.

A couple of days passed and I was thinking of hoow great that car would look with a paint job. Again pressing my luck I told the Lord "a paint job would be nice". Going back to the drive-thru from the privacy of the self made public bathroom/prayer room.. I watch as a jeep drives off the road, goes down a small hill and collides with my "new" car. My eyes looked a little like this O_O.
I felt bad and was very sorry for asking for material things. I figured this was my punishment. Within a few days the car was fixed with a NEW paint job courtesy of the other guys insurance company. Great thanks and a blessing in disguise.

Another example happened not to long ago. I was at work and had been going through a trial concerning my faith. I got the bright idea that I needed to see Jesus. Far fetched but that was what I wanted. I would take breaks at random time during the day and goto the bathroom... humble myself in the dirtiest place I could think of.. the bathroom floor. My nose to the ground I wanted to see Jesus, I was convinced. Nothing happened. I get home (I live in the country) and my wife and I sat on the front porch to drink coffee. A snow white dove lands at our feet.. I have never even seen a dove before. Staying for a while, we fed the bird... unable to touch it. Again everyday for a week the bird came back in the evenings to visit and then would leave again. You could explain that or you could just smile and say "Now whats the odds of that happening." :-)

I own a bussiness. I do well for myself and couldnt ask for more in life than what I have. Not to long ago, things got tough and I desperately needed to hire at least 2 more people. After searching for the right ones, I came up with nothing. Getting frustrated I took this need to the church. That night I made a prayer request for 2 people to come to me looking for a job. To keep it simple.. the next day, out of the blue here comes two skilled people searching for a job. The request was answered and the situation couldnt be more perfect.
You could either make excuses and try to work it out in your head or you can thank Gd for the blessing.

These are of course examples and the list could go on and on. I am greatful for the blessings in my life.


http://www.geocities.com/carapacedweller/kinjis/Tutorial_Index.html A5 and A6 tutorials <> E3S series "Show me once and I got it, tell me once and I'll think twice."
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Kinji_2007] #117375
03/15/07 13:20
03/15/07 13:20
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
M
Matt_Aufderheide Offline
Expert
Matt_Aufderheide  Offline
Expert
M

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
Seriously what is the point of these discussions? There is no way to convince poeple that their deeply held beliefs are nonsense.


Sphere Engine--the premier A6 graphics plugin.
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Matt_Aufderheide] #117376
03/15/07 15:10
03/15/07 15:10
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,682
Coppell, Texas
Ran Man Offline
Expert
Ran Man  Offline
Expert

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,682
Coppell, Texas
Nonsense?

I know, I'm trying to convince you atheist in a God.

But, I do not consider your views "nonsense".
I used to be a non-believer and making fun of christians.

Your views are not "non-sense", but are just only in error.


Cougar Interactive

www.zoorace.com
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Ran Man] #117377
03/15/07 15:15
03/15/07 15:15
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
K
Kinji_2007 Offline
Member
Kinji_2007  Offline
Member
K

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 183
Just conversations is all. :-) I like discussing spiritual things and so do atheist obviously.

Last edited by Kinji_2007; 03/15/07 15:17.

http://www.geocities.com/carapacedweller/kinjis/Tutorial_Index.html A5 and A6 tutorials <> E3S series "Show me once and I got it, tell me once and I'll think twice."
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Kinji_2007] #117378
03/15/07 15:37
03/15/07 15:37
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,010
analysis paralysis
NITRO777 Offline
Expert
NITRO777  Offline
Expert

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,010
analysis paralysis

Quote:

Seriously what is the point of these discussions? There is no way to convince poeple that their deeply held beliefs are nonsense.




I always like my beleifs challenged because it helps me re-establish what I know. I might not be 'converted' and learn anything from an opposing viewpoint, but I learn a lot about my own viewpoint through the process of defending it(if that makes sense)

I think the danger comes when you take things personally and get angry which is also somthing that happens to everyone I think. But if you can keep civilized and intelligent, I think you can indeed benefit from having your beliefs tested.

I was actually hoping jcl would follow up on his "light objections" but he has seemed to lost ambition and thats ok. We are all also busy doing other things.

Last edited by NITRO777; 03/15/07 16:01.
Re: Bible apologetics [Re: Matt_Aufderheide] #117379
03/15/07 15:55
03/15/07 15:55
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
Quote:

Seriously what is the point of these discussions? There is no way to convince poeple that their deeply held beliefs are nonsense.




True, infact I really doubt Kinji has actually looked inside Antiquities, but instead probably pasted from a christian site. It would be quite useless to explain why Flavius Josephus most probably didn't meant the christian jesus but someone else... "and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ," -> according to biblical scholars this probably was added lateron.

Apart from that you've got to understand that for something like this to be of any real historical value it should be made during the life of Jesus, not close to 100 years later. You will probably disagree, but with this in mind there's really no solid evidence for the person Jesus as mentioned in the bible. Infact, isn't it suprising that if the Jesus of the bible really did exist that he doesn't get mentioned way more often???

Cheers


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Page 3 of 11 1 2 3 4 5 10 11

Moderated by  jcl, Lukas, old_bill, Spirit 

Kompaktes W�rterbuch des UnendlichenCompact Dictionary of the Infinite


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1