Quote:
I have seen miracle after miracle occur in my life and I walk and talk with God on a regular basis, and so have millions of other people all over the world, but the majority of scientist still think we are crazy even though we all are telling them our experiences first hand.
Miracles by what definition? I've seen some absolute amazing things of life and thought those to be miracles. But those events were not close to impossible to happen or something like that.
By the way, the problem of experiences is that it's a way of seeing things, if we don't experience the same, we don't 'see'. Basically it's somewhere between 'believing' and 'knowing', because you can't prove you've had a certain experience, yet for yourself it might very well be 100% convincing. I would probably consider such experiences to be evidence myself, if I would have had one ... Scientists naturally consider those kind of things to be crazy simply because a.) you can't provide proof and b.) it could very well be 'just' inside your head indeed. There are plenty of crazy people already.
Having said that, I prefer looking at the evidence, but just like people claiming to be talking to God, I can't tell if they are crazy or if they are actually telling the truth. I would even go so far as to state that they are telling the truth from their perspective, however are those 'truths' part of our reality or their illusion? I may never know the answer to that question, like many others.
Quote:
This is just in case anyone is interested in scientific side of it.
Thanks, this is interesting indeed.
Cheers
Last edited by PHeMoX; 03/18/07 04:32.
