nemas... if i were u i'd just do what i did. I updated from commercial to pro now... that auto intitled me to A7 pro at no extra cost. Waiting until A7 comes out might be a bit more costly. However... i don't see a simple solution for ppl with A6 pro upgrading to A7 pro. I think i probably ended up saving 200-300$ doing things the way i did it... Good Luck

@PhantomVI
es gibt immer noch das online handbuch

Sure but what about people like myself who own commercial but want to test A7?

I really want to stick with GS due to I actually like it, also financial reasons but am considering going to use Quest3D soon for this new level I have made,

surely a test demo to people like myself that will show how good A7 will be,
will encourage me to use GS for my next project...:)

physics and render to texture are the most important differences

correct
Does it worth while paying 600 usd more just for render to texture ?
I dont think so

You also get the resource packer which protects your assets (and it's better than using a free packer since it doesn't unpack stuff at runtime). Other differences are no splashscreen requirement, unlimited multiplayer features, inclusion of level editor, high resolution static shadows, customizable startup window, and when A7 ships you'll have access to the distribution manager (see last item in forecast), and the new BSP that will allow concave

There's more than enough reasons to own Pro than physics (well, A6 Pro) and render to texture. I still think Commercial is the best value for the money, but there are quite a few Pro features that are pretty important and worth the extra money if you need them.

Another point to own Pro is you are eligible to become beta tester.

You don't have to own Pro to become a tester. I've owned Commercial since '99 and recently became one. See the beta page for all of the requirements.