Yes, perhaps 3 Billion years worth of existance and growth can account for the existance of what we know to be real today but then again perhaps not.

The presumption here is that an evolutionary line maintains a constant existential geneology over the duration of that timeline and as far as the interpretation of our history goes from every conceivable science looking into the matter, this is simply not possible at all.
We see this now in our world with climate changes, planetary axical shifts, solarsystem orbital dangers and so on presenting definate possibilities of life extinction to all, let alone ourselves.

It is the one factor evolutionists overlook and one which needs to be raised into the light of any argument or discussion concerning the "WHY" that such threads fish for perhaps.

If the Universe was indeed a controlled laborototy then I would certainly favour an evolutionary angle..however, to my mind, both Evolution and God should be seen as one and the same, an anomolous factor never to be seen again.

Both are retrospectivly discernable in one form or another but contemporanous or probable forward temporal discernment is always dim and therefore unkbown.

In short, its a wild guessing game on many fronts.

As for moral obligations to a theory, no That doesnt gell with me at all.
To my mind each and every individual has a moral obligation only to the self as part and parcel of the self preservation drive, and therefore to each other as a dependancy drive for mutual coexistance.

So if our arguments or presented cases for discussions can reach a platau of agreement that defines our probale creation or moments of evolutioary growth (Be they mutations or "Thy Will Be Done")at a more immediate timeline spanning perhaps 120 to 250k years as would seem to be the most likely period to look at given the limited genetic diversity we currently have, can we honestly 'assume' that we are the result of an unbroken genetic mutable line spanning this impossible 3 Billion year duration?

As pointed out previously, the structure and composition of our genes intergrate amazingly well to produce life as we know it but how could this have possibly been the result of random selection? Its as though a programmer wrote the genetic code! It is so complex and co-dependant as to seem 'Designed'.

The point of this post?

To gather the background of my game project in order to base it on a solid storyline foundation.

You may recall my prior posts of test levels and demo's and maybe you even read my then 'Storyline', well, its a game that pursues these questions in a (I hope) serious tone and porjected to span the above timelines, 3 Billion or 300K years.

The question of and for life, its definitions, variety and direction given over to a computer game may spark more light on the subject for me as well as resolve or add to the many questions the first post laid out.