|
|
Re: Made or Born?
[Re: NITRO777]
#121580
04/07/07 13:05
04/07/07 13:05
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
Quote:
***Darkness was upon the face of the "deep" meaning the "water", therefore it is logical to conclude that the first, pre-adamite creation was destroyed by a pre-Noahic flood!
Why would this be logical?? Don't they mean 'deep' as in 'the sea'. Isn't it a bit far fetched to interpret this as a cryptic description of the effects of a 'flood'?
Quote:
Darkness was upon the face of the "deep"
'face' = surface, right? 'deep' = water or sea, right? Well, if 'darkness was upon the surface of the sea', it could simply mean 'it was night'. 
As for the embryonic stages, please take a look at these pictures Nitro: http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/wwwhuman/Stages/Images/Cst800.jpg
Between 20 and 30 days we do look like what fish look like at a certain stage. Both our anatomy and morphology have huge similarities during that period of embryonic growth, só many similarities that it's a little hard to deny actually. A spoon and a fork share similarities because they have partially the same function, same goes for our 'embryonic-fish' stage, so an analogy would actually be more or less correct, as long as you remember that a fork is not a spoon nor vice-versa. We don't say we áre 'fishes' before we grow into humans, because that's ridiculous indeed.
Quote:
Just because a fork has similarities to a spoon does not mean one is derived from another.
The spoon was derived from a fork actually. 
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|