Searching results of 3DMARK 2001, Pentium 4 ~ 2,4 Ghz Win2K in most cases, I posted one of the best results appeared (so specially in low end cards, these are very uncomon performance):

code:

---

Graphic Card               Fill Rate      HIPOLY
                         Single Texture   1 Light
--------------------------------------------------
Radeon 9800               2.025.100.000    86,3 M
Geforce 4 Ti 4600         1.144.000.000    59,2 M
Radeon 8500 Pro           1.003.500.000    43,7 M
Radeon 9600                 968.300.000    66,2 M
Geforce 3 Ti                835.500.000    29,4 M
Matrox Parhelia             735.100.000    24,9 M
Radeon 9000                 673.400.000    21,6 M
S3 Xabre                    626.200.000    35,6 M
Geforce 4 MX                509.400.000    21,8 M
nForce 2                    402.000.000    24,1 M
--------------------------------------------------
Mobility Radeon 9000        673.400.000    23,4 M
Geforce 4 Go 440            502.100.000    29,6 M
Geforce 2 Go                188.600.000    15,5 M
Mobility Radeon             131.600.000     4,8 M
--------------------------------------------------
Geforce 256 SDR             424.600.000    10,7 M
Radeon 64 DDR               390.000.000    12,1 M
Geforce 2 Ti                380.100.000    27,9 M
Riva TNT (16 mb)            252.300.000     5,3 M
Matrox G400                 196.700.000     4,9 M
Rage 128 (32 mb)            106.300.000     4,4 M
S3 ProSavage                 97.200.000     2,5 M
Intel i830 (16 mb)           64.400.000     6,7 M

---

PS: I wish I had not installed DirectX 9
Radeon 64 DDR - 257.400.000 and 5,4 M

interesting table!

your card is able to handle only 390.000.000 (or 260.000.000 with dx9?) single textured pixels per second so this could explain your poor performance...