ooops I forgot that for you creationists thousands ( yes thousands ) fossils of animals showings primitive forms of ears or eyes or wings etc are not an evidence of a step by step improvement
Did you realize what you said ? in such a case there is not creator !
I myself I would not be so sure, I thinkk it is unlikely

The scientific methods for dating the age of terrains does count for nothing, of course
I wonder however why some layers of terrain contain only some types of fossils and not others
ok you have for sure an explanation
I fully understand also that you have no time to take care of my education
Can I at least expect that your answers ( right or wrong ) are consistent with my post (right or wrong) ?

What genetic has to do with my claim

"The most advanced form of life very seldom have reached ,using a math expression an "absolute maximum " , rather a "relative maximum" "

I meant, that the supposed perfection of the nature is a bloody lie
There are thousand ( yes thousand ) of ridicoulus mistakes in the so called "Creation"