Hilbert's Hotel

Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum...
Discussing Infinity: theism and atheism, prime numbers, immortality, cosmology, philosophy...

Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
Zorro 2.70
by jcl. 09/29/25 09:24
optimize global parameters SOLVED
by dBc. 09/27/25 17:07
ZorroGPT
by TipmyPip. 09/27/25 10:05
assetHistory one candle shift
by jcl. 09/21/25 11:36
Plugins update
by Grant. 09/17/25 16:28
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
Rocker`s Revenge
Stug 3 Stormartillery
Iljuschin 2
Galactic Strike X
Who's Online Now
5 registered members (Dico, AndrewAMD, TipmyPip, NewbieZorro, Grant), 15,253 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
krishna, DrissB, James168, Ed_Love, xtns
19168 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Environment [Re: Tobias] #128113
05/05/07 23:20
05/05/07 23:20
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,264
Wellington
Nems Offline

.
Nems  Offline

.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,264
Wellington
If you think Time Magazine is a science fiction book, you need to reasess your knowledge base.
In or around 1981 to 83, Time magazine did a huge feature on Rocket ships and their effects on the ozone layer, the figures were absolutly staggering.

If you think World News is a science fiction book, well...what can I say thats not insulting...Reuters and all even...

Follow up articles in most major news outlets at the time centered upon the story as too many ships were crashing when they did not do so previously to that time period, with comments from some agencies discribing this as a normal occurrence for he life of the planet and that more was yet to come.

You may be able to test this by tracking the orbit of the moon.

Where once it sailed majestically on an even looking orbit, it now rises in the east, heads north for a bit then races back southwards to set in the west. (Southern Hemispherical observations)

Last edited by AGD; 05/05/07 23:48.
Re: Environment [Re: Nems] #128114
05/05/07 23:57
05/05/07 23:57
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,441
ventilator Offline
Senior Expert
ventilator  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,441
new york is small on the map but imagine all the material we have blown and will blow into our atmosphere. a lot of the organic material from carbon and other ages.

for example the current estimations say that there still are 800 billion tons of coal available. according to my rough calculation this would be about 3 times the area of germany if you made a 1m thick layer. i could imagine that burning this has some global effect?

i haven't looked up how much coal we already have burned since the beginning of industrialization or how the amount of oil compares to that.

Re: Environment [Re: ventilator] #128115
05/06/07 03:57
05/06/07 03:57
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
M
Matt_Aufderheide Offline
Expert
Matt_Aufderheide  Offline
Expert
M

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
Quote:

This is a so obvious remark to be really silly
Do you expect that a "microbe like factory", at earth scale, can release a huge amount of emissions over time?




Again what does it matter how big the factory is? In any case its not just factories its millions of automobiles, trucks, ships, powerplants, etc...

The points is, you are simply saying becasue that to you it seems like too small an amount, its not possible. that isnt a good argument.


Sphere Engine--the premier A6 graphics plugin.
Re: Environment [Re: Matt_Aufderheide] #128116
05/06/07 08:33
05/06/07 08:33
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,140
Baunatal, Germany
Tobias Offline

Moderator
Tobias  Offline

Moderator

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,140
Baunatal, Germany
Quote:

i'm not sure what to say.. you cant use those kinds of "common sense" arguements to dispute actual science. (...) Why do people assume that they are qualified to judge a scientific theory if they really know nothing about it?



Thats a general problem with discussing scientific issues, many people do not know much about science and use "common sense" arguments. Like: it's common sense that the sun orbits the earth, every child can see that!

Still I think you can discuss science without being a scientist, but then everyone should take this a little more serious and inform himself about the issue.

Quote:

If you think Time Magazine is a science fiction book, you need to reasess your knowledge base.
In or around 1981 to 83, Time magazine did a huge feature on Rocket ships and their effects on the ozone layer, the figures were absolutly staggering.




Sure, my friend. But I guess it had to be Time magazine issue of 2081, today I'm afraid "rocket ships" are not invented yet. But if you mean airplanes, yes they certainly have an effect on the ozone layer.

Re: Environment [Re: Tobias] #128117
05/06/07 09:06
05/06/07 09:06
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,264
Wellington
Nems Offline

.
Nems  Offline

.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,264
Wellington
Really?, then whats those things that send people up to orbit to work on the space station? Arrows???

What are those things that transport and deliver warheads? stones???

Comon, what gives here? They are all powered by rocket engines, doesn't that make them 'Rocket Ships'?

He he he, theres more yet, what about the X series (Blackbirds) and so on...

How did Man get to the moon? Walk??? LOL.

Dont get me wrong here, I am not taking the mickey out of anyone but a little 'common sense' might be appropriate here.(gins...)

Mind you, it could have been National Geographic Magazine not Time as this was such a long time ago.
I am sure an archieval search would produce the issue I'm referring to and beleive it or not, it didnt even raise a stink at the time.

Heres something else thats wierd, major portions of the South Pacific ocean (where I live) do not have a mantle covering them! Where did it go?

All true blue and accessible to check out from news publications.

Last edited by AGD; 05/06/07 09:15.
Re: Environment [Re: Nems] #128118
05/06/07 09:28
05/06/07 09:28
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,140
Baunatal, Germany
Tobias Offline

Moderator
Tobias  Offline

Moderator

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,140
Baunatal, Germany
Well a rocket and a ship are two different things and rocket ships normally belong to science fiction. But ok this may be arguing about words. Anyway the damage to the ozone layer was caused by fridges and not by rocket ships, it's the CFC gases that destroy the layer.

Concerning the moon I suggest you stay awake tonight and observe its orbit. I'm a hobby astronomer and can assure you that it's still ellipsoidal and hasn't changed a bit except that it moves away from the earth by 4 cm per year. Also the earth axis is still in its place.

Re: Environment [Re: AlbertoT] #128119
05/06/07 10:06
05/06/07 10:06
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 414
Munich, Germany
R
Robotronic Offline
Senior Member
Robotronic  Offline
Senior Member
R

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 414
Munich, Germany
Quote:


I watched a talk show on television , yesterday night
Someone claimed that human beings are responsible for climatic changes on earth because of industrial pollution .
Someone else claimed that human impact is definitly negligible.





First of all a television debate would be boring, if there was a big consensus, so the media will tend to present you two sides - just for dramatic reasons - in order to make money.

Some say this, others say that, so what do we believe?
I can not claim to be an expert on climate change, but this was a very interesting article about the background of this debate:

The denial industry

Re: Environment [Re: Matt_Aufderheide] #128120
05/06/07 11:37
05/06/07 11:37
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,245
A
AlbertoT Offline OP
Serious User
AlbertoT  Offline OP
Serious User
A

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,245
Quote:


f
Again what does it matter how big the factory is? In any case its not just factories its millions of automobiles, trucks, ships, powerplants, etc...






I am astonished that you and other members can not grasp so a simple argument
First of all ,I repeat once again that it did not come out of my head , it is an opinion supported by many scientists, not all of course :

Human's impact on the global environment is negligible

However plaese take a breath before answering:

" Pouring a dose of poison in a glass of water , is it the same as pouring it in the Rio of Amazons ? "

I suppose it is evident that you must match the total pollution generated by industrialization and the dimension of the container you pour the pollution in

What does it mean , there are milions cars.... ?
Ok these milions cars and hundres factories are all inside a 0.5 cm circle,in our model !!!

Moreover there is definitly no evident link between climate and pollution
I repeat again, in the 60 - 70' ecologists were expecting a glacial era

If you go through the chronicles from middle age till nowdays you see hot and cold periods

That said I dont mean that such hypothesis is true but for sure is realistic



Last edited by AlbertoT; 05/06/07 11:53.
Re: Environment [Re: AlbertoT] #128121
05/06/07 12:07
05/06/07 12:07
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,900
Bielefeld, Germany
Pappenheimer Offline
Senior Expert
Pappenheimer  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,900
Bielefeld, Germany
Although, I've heard that scientists said that it isn't sure that the warming is caused by the pollution of the humans, I have to say that both is said about a future. That means you cannot say, it is right or wrong, but you have to say that it's probability is higher or lower. But, that means, as long as you can't be sure, if it is caused by us humans, you _must_ start counter-actions because of the big delay of the global results!

The other way round, as soon that get undeniable scientific results that this all is caused by humans, it is probably too late to start a correction at all.


---------
Matt mentioned a few of the polluters, let's add some others: _each_ human being makes fire with wood or similar things because of warming up food or heating the house, each cow and sheep emits methan which seems to be involved into this process, too.

Re: Environment [Re: Pappenheimer] #128122
05/07/07 16:28
05/07/07 16:28
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,506
Germany
F
fogman Offline
Expert
fogman  Offline
Expert
F

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,506
Germany
Quote:

It seems a nonsense to me that we can really change the the global ( not the local ones) enviromental conditions of our planet





The problem is, that the global conditions are a chaotic system. A small impact can have a very big effect.


no science involved
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  jcl, Lukas, old_bill, Spirit 

Kompaktes W�rterbuch des UnendlichenCompact Dictionary of the Infinite


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1