Quote:
Time is just a measurement of any change.Without change,there is no idea of time.
I don't think it's ever possible to have absolutely no change and thus effectively 'freezing time'. I think even when infinitely small there will always be a change because of the way all things seem to be linked to eachother. Apart from that personally it seems to me that 'time' itself is artificial. Perhaps in our view it makes sense that an infinite universe indicates infinite time, but if we define our universe as 'constantly expanding', then 'time' itself doesn't have to be infinite. On the other hand I believe it makes sense to assume that there could also have been a lot of time before our universe 'came into existence' in whichever way. My point is, I don't think time's possible infinite nature excludes our universe from possibly being finite. Not sure about the other way around scenario. Is it even possible to have no time when something is infinitely big? That would assume there's absolutely no change, which like I said at the beginning seems rather strange to me. It's still a theoretical possibility, but we know for a fact that the world hasn't 'frozen in time' yet off course. 
A simplified picture;
( I really wonder how they determined time is a bend curve in other words change of movement with a 'constant speed' is in fact not constant but fluctuating? Got any links? )
Cheers
| 
