@TWO: That looks promising. Thanks for posting.

@HeelX: My frequent use of "Conitec should.." should actually be interpreted as "Conitec should consider.." but I'm simply leaving out the "consider." This is what I've always meant when using that phrase. I'll try and remember this in the future. Regardless, Conitec should consider all ideas I throw their way because they're usually good ones.

It seems there have been a rash of users misinterpreting some of the things I say in posts here lately. I'm not sure why, but I'm guessing it's some kind of "lost in translation" type situation given most of those who are slapping me on the wrist are not native English speakers. Just remember that I always tell it like it is and don't care if the person on the receiving end (or the community) likes it or not.