|
1 registered members (TipmyPip),
18,561
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: lcd or crt ??
[Re: Dan Silverman]
#166480
11/14/07 14:53
11/14/07 14:53
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
Quote:
I would shoot for at least 8-12ms for the refresh rate. If they have faster, great, but compare prices and refresh rates for each monitor. If the refresh rates get up to 16ms or higher, then I would forget the monitor and find another. However, refresh rates are a strange thing. Like benchmarked software, companies tend to use a variety of means to determine refresh rates and then list the best result (ignoring the poor results). Therefore it is possible for one monitor to have a poorer refresh rate (i.e. 12ms) and actually outperform one rated with a lower refresh rate.
Yes, the monitor I mentioned (Samsung 226BW) is said to have a refresh rate of 2ms, but in reality it's more somewhere near 6ms or 7ms. Same story goes for contrast ratio. On the box it says 3000:1 (dynamic) contrast ratio which is insanely high, but in reality it's closer to 1000:1 contrast ratio.
So... don't believe the specs on the box, but check reviews out and look at the monitor in the store if you can ,
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|