1 registered members (TipmyPip),
18,449
guests, and 6
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Lite-C vs. C-Script
[Re: William]
#166927
11/14/07 11:56
11/14/07 11:56
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,157 Connecticut, USA
Blink

Expert
|

Expert
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,157
Connecticut, USA
|
i am just really starting to understand c-script, so the new manual solutions is confusing, because some of them are lite-c and i dont understand why some of my scripts dont work properly. they should be seperated. two manuals. its really not fair to the people who dont wish to go to lite-c. i am a poor man, and i dont have money to convert, and i dont think i should be forced to, after i spent my money on the version i have now.
My Famous Quotes: "Hip hop is like a virus, infecting everyone and everything around it. Every form of media has some way,shape or form, assimilated hip hop into it." It has also mutated into other strains like, trip hop, house, rap, gangster, and conscious forms. Once you are infected with it, its with you for life."
|
|
|
Re: Lite-C vs. C-Script
[Re: Blink]
#166928
11/17/07 14:35
11/17/07 14:35
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,436 Germany, Luebeck
Xarthor
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,436
Germany, Luebeck
|
Alright, so it would be good to have both in one. I agree with that, but as it is today it is definatly not the best solution. As there are sometimes Lite-C examples, and sometimes not. What about making an open documentation project? (using the wiki) EDIT: Ok, I started to port the manual to the wiki and added a link to it on the main page of it. This is a direct link: http://www.coniserver.net/wiki/index.php/DocumentationI would really appreciate any hints and any help with this. Sure it will not replace the "real" manual, but might be a good place to write down some tricks using Lite-C and C-Script how to avoid ugly code or any comments to certain engine functions. Thanks
Last edited by Xarthor; 11/17/07 17:55.
|
|
|
|