what a silly answer
Many game developers use more than one engine simply because every one has its strong and weak points
Should an engine fit all, then stick to it and forget the rest

XNASorcerer, you sound like a raving fan-boy. this isn't a direct attack, this is just a comment on the way your posts appear -- lots of exclamation marks and overly-defensive posts.

there was nothing wrong or misplaced about AlbertoT's request for some comparative info. almost all the users on this forum are 3DGS users and will best be able to analyse another engine through comparisons with A6/A7.

julz

But that is how it starts!!! Look at other posts!

Looks awesome man , will definately look more into this when i have more time.

Just 1 quick question, how easy to edit and place entity in level and assign "action" to it?

well, i'm a bit prejudiced against xna because it binds me to directX and c#. i'd prefer openGL for portability and a wider chice of languages. or did i miss something?

nice count, would be even nicer with a 5000 poly normal mapped, shadow throwing entity in view.
such high fps makes my video card humming... can you limit the editor fps?

Hmm..nothing really impress me. It seems a serious competitor of lite-C.

So is there a function similar function wait(), and the engine automatically scheduling all the function execution?