I'm not avoiding any points and I certainly don't consider myself clever; Rather the opposite (on both points): I am affirming your all your points in your original post and stating them as all true.

Thus in light of the evidence you have provided and that I take them all as true, I ask again: In light of the facts we already have about the world, what is the alternative world-view that encompasses all these facts and thus should be taught and how do we validate it to the public?

All I'm hoping for are a simple few paragraphs about this replacement world-view so we can show how it is, obviously, better than the current one. And from this, we can inform the world about how evolution is wrong but this new theory, our theory, is right. That's all. As this is a thread about Evolution, then I would suspect that a replacement to the evolution world-view would be a good start. So why not start there and start the outline of this replacement theory?

And then we can work on, what should our curriculum be? What other theories should we consider in order for it not to be an us vs. them? How do we validate or invalidate experiments to validate or invalidate our new world-view? Etc...