Before I will start to answer some questions and statements, I have a question for you I'd like to have an answer on, to make sure I understood your post in general so I'll be able to draw my conclusion, and show you that the answer of life is
most likely (I don't want to sound like your generalized scientists) 'evolution' rather than design/creationism.
My question: Do you agree with the following statements? You should take it as literal as possible, it is meant to be exactly as I wrote it, and there are no hidden meanings behind it if you would say 'yes' or otherwise.
*An organisation can not exist out of chaos by itself.
*If you would have well organised structures of molecules existing spontaniously out of chaos, you could easy draw the conclusion that a cell containing DNA, RNA and all the tiny machines moving inside cell could be spontaniously formed as well.---------------------------------------------------------------------
Now follows a not-to-the-point wave of answers to questions you only made to enhance our insight of your opinion, but I think you have been wrong on several aspects.
How about the fact that fruits (nature's nutritious candy for us) are basically the right size for us , and have the right amount of nutrients for us , oh yeah , all of this is pure luck and chance right ?
Hmmm... did you try eat a whole pineapple in half an hour? Or a coconut... a melon? Or can you survive on a grape or strawberry for a day? Or doesn't that count as 'basically'? I guess it's even a better 'right size' for small animals, they can live much longer on fruit than we. Heck, not to mention how long bacteria can live on one piece of fruit... doesn't that make the fruit even more 'the right size' for them?
This does not say that evolution is thé answer, but nor does it prove that design/creationism is.
It is very obvious we were created to take advance to all of the properties of our existence , we have eyes to see , ears to hear , nose to smell , and nerves to sense touch , and a brain that handles all of this things for automatically so we dont have to worry about any of them , they are all done for us , all we have to do is enjoy our being
As stated by Larry, we are far from perfect for our environment. To clarify: Why can't we see all of the colorspectrum? Is infrared only priveledged for snakes and ultraviolet only for butterflies? We can't find our way in the dark either by screaming against the walls from meters away... I guess the designer only wanted bats to be able to do that. Why can't we sense blood from miles away like sharks, or smell food from hundreds of meters like wolves? We only notice a very very very very small part of the world around us.
Or does it make more sense that we were created , in a way , that we would not have to bother with all of our internal systems
Yes that makes sense, that's why we have been selected by natural selection, the animals that did had to think and do everything themselves had no time left to survive and got eaten... This of course does not prove that natural selection was really that what happened, but it doesn't prove God/Designer/Creationism either.
There are no bones of any transitions , every single animal alive today , should have thousands or millions of evolutionary stages
Even better, we have a living prove:
Eclyse the zorse It looks so strange that that has to be a hoax eh? Well she isn't
Imagine such a change from only one of, perhaps a few dozen of such mutations, would apply over billions of years.
