"An organisation can not exist out of chaos by itself."
Chaos CANNOT create itself from nothing.
Let me show you in simple terms the problem with this.
You are instantly assuming there was chaos from nothing (there was nothing before the universe right?)

"If you would have well organised structures of molecules existing spontaniously out of chaos, you could easy draw the conclusion that a cell containing DNA, RNA and all the tiny machines moving inside cell could be spontaniously formed as well."

Really ? So now the chaos not only exists form nothing , itt has well organised structres of molecules , which bind and create a cell with DNA , RNA, and all the "machines".

Did you read your question ? You are assuming all of this ALWAYS EXISTED, you are saying chaos happened from nothing and this chaos had all the molecules we need for life .

So to sumerize what you are implying , all our molecules always existed ? But you state Chaos created the universe ? Did chaos create the molecules ? If so from what ?

See , before you even begin trying to explain anything , you've already made a ton of assumptions with no base to them or proof.

"As stated by Larry, we are far from perfect for our environment. To clarify: Why can't we see all of the colorspectrum?"
You obviously missed the point I was trying to make.

"Yes that makes sense, that's why we have been selected by natural selection"
So it makes sense but thats not how it happened ?

"the animals that did had to think and do everything themselves had no time left to survive and got eaten... This of course does not prove that natural selection was really that what happened, but it doesn't prove God/Designer/Creationism either."
So then you are saying your argument for evolution and natural selection doesn's prove evolution or natural selection ever happened ?

"Even better, we have a living prove: Eclyse the zorse
It looks so strange that that has to be a hoax eh?"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thats evolution ?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"For while most zebra-horse crossbreeds"
"The one-year-old zorse was the accidental product of a holiday romance when her mother, Eclipse, was taken from her German safari park home to a ranch in Italy for a brief spell.
There she was able to roam freely with other horses and a number of zebras, including one called Ulysses who took a fancy to her.
When Eclipse returned home, she surprised her keepers by giving birth to the baby zorse whose mixed markings betray her colourful parentage. "

Oh , so then a horse and a zebra got it on and the result is that half horse half zebra. Are you actually using this for your argument on evolution ? LMFAO
That in fact CONTRADICTS evolution , evolution talks about natural selection not cross breeding to mutate , lol , get your facts straight.