See , before you even begin trying to explain anything , you've already made a ton of assumptions with no base to them or proof.
Please remain polite and pretend like you are an adult. I asked you for verification whether or not I understood you well, and I didn't assume anything. You start to assume that I assume, now that's getting weird. YOu don't know what I am thinking, and so should you answer like it. I asked you nothing more but a question, and I expect nothing more but an answer to the question.
You are instantly assuming there was chaos from nothing (there was nothing before the universe right?)
Right? I don't know, you tell me. Or better don't, you don't know either.
Did you read your question ? You are assuming all of this ALWAYS EXISTED, you are saying chaos happened from nothing and this chaos had all the molecules we need for life .
Did you? I sure haven't got an answer on my question: "My question: Do you agree with the following statements?". You could also normally have said: "no, for chaos never existed, the 'very beginning' was designed by a designer". Sure you are against this statement as well. So please tell me in 1 short sentence what you really mean to say in this large post full of not-to-the-point questions. If you think that chaos never have existed, you could just have said so in one line and all the rest of your post became trivial.
It is true then, what you say. It could be that chaos never existed, and I happily wont deny that. There is actually (relative for us humans) a 50/50 chance that there either was chaos, or was not chaos. 50/50 because we do not know the answer, and it could be both.
So now I ask you again, do you agree with the following statements?
*If there was chaos from the beginning (whatever was before the existence of our universe is not of any relevance), then there was no designer/creator.
*If chaos never existed, and everything is the work of a designer, then evolution can not exist.--Now on to the more not-to-the-point part of your post--
"As stated by Larry, we are far from perfect for our environment. To clarify: Why can't we see all of the colorspectrum?"
You obviously missed the point I was trying to make.
Well that's why I wrote they were not-to-the-point answers, didn't I. Nevertheless they put something straight.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Thats evolution ?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yup, welcome to the real world.
Oh , so then a horse and a zebra got it on and the result is that half horse half zebra. Are you actually using this for your argument on evolution ? LMFAO
That in fact CONTRADICTS evolution , evolution talks about natural selection not cross breeding to mutate , lol , get your facts straight.
I don't use it fór evolution, nor for creationism/design, for this could also be an argument for thát! I mean, the designer made the DNA then, and this zorse is the result of it, why not? You're laughing at your own theory now, if I put it that way. As I said, they are answers on various statements and questions you asked, and the answers are, indeed, not to the point.
We then also may draw the conclusion that your questions are not to the point either.
