>Grayson.

To me DX9 would be a wonderful thing, I would just love for A6 to reach these levels, and maybe then I'll be able to see what I want to see with my new computer. But the fact is, most of the people that will play my games most likely won't be running a 3.2Ghz P4, they may be running a 900Mhz pc, so I think it is good for Conitec to keep the engine at this for now, and maybe upgrade later, when dx9 is more common.

Also, In light of these views, would it be possiable for conitec to update the engine, but use dx9 as an alternate method. They could just update the engine to dx9, but also keep the current one, and maybe link the two together in some way. Like there could be 2 MEDs, SEDs and WEDs.

That would just be great.
Then it shows people that A6 isn't a lower class engine as it uses the latest technology (I just hate people that talk like that.)