Thank you for your comments!

I don't get that bug. I even made a screenshot to prove it, but I am too lazy to upload it. Did you maybe change the positions of the inventory-view-entities? I can't think of something else, but then again, it's quite early.


I don't have MSN. But I have ICQ, at least. Yay! I won't tell my number here (mainly because I can't remember it), but it's somewhere here, hidden...

In other words, it's in my profile

ok i will look into that again today, I dont think I did, but hey usealy the simple awnser is the correct one lol..

This was a really good idea, most inventory codes I looked at require 100's of small bitmaps to show the item. One of the reasons I like this code, and I have given you full credit in the project for your hard work that went into it.

Thnak you

I went through the instructions, and your test level, I could not see anything diffrent, I even took my modified code out and placed just your code in, still getting the same error. Heres what I got.....

chapter2
WoodenShield
A shield constructed from wooden planks. Not as sturdy as a metal
crafted one. This one looks to be fairly made.
Armor Rating +10
1
0
1.5
50
END
chapter3
Chainmail
Chainmail is a type of armour that consists of small metal rings linked
together in a pattern to form a mesh.
Armor Rating 40
1
0
1.5
150
END

Models are named obj002.mdl, and obj003.mdl

both have skill1 set corasponding thier name.

I can pick the items up, and when i do, and look at the armor catagory.
The text appers right ie item2 - in one box, item 3 in the box lower
but i still get both models images or views in the top box.

I even went back to make sure they were aligned in the same spots to see if it could be due to thier postioning in the mdl editor...

Completly lost on this one...any ideas ?

Lol

Ok I dont know what I did, but it started to work...Sorry for taking up your time...

I've sent you a PM about your problem... Could you please check if what I mentioned there is the cause?

Yeah you were right, I was running in a resouloution that didnt support it..Thanks for the time and again really awsome code