Lool
Example:
Start with a quad 40x40,then move to the right , while it fades in, and scales horizonaly.
Well? but this needs code, but if things could be more visual, then it would be easier and faster, Just that. And dont need to script those possibilties, and when i need more complex flash like menus this are a bit harder. Because there are some variables, speeds etc that needs to be experimented, and see if it works good, and not testing with speed =2 , then closing, testing with 4, then not the right yet and change to 6.. Wast of time..

And ...
Yeah you right..everything is coded, but somethings could be simplified... thats why most programs are visual interface.. thats why you have WINDOW and not work with MS DOS... right..

Simplified is also the aim of the new Gstudio feature GED ( not only for this reason but also..)
Because everything comes more interactiv, and user friendly...

Your are telling me the same thing, as: "Oh i dont know why adobe flash has a visual interface for animations and motion guides! if people could code the movements on the action script by their own."
OR
I dont know why the use of easy particles!! why?? if i could code everything!!
please...

buts its ok i see i'm the only wrong here... no problem dudes. maybe im retarded