|
Re: Lunar Landing hoax..
[Re: Damocles_]
#298762
11/17/09 16:42
11/17/09 16:42
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
OP
Senior Expert
|
OP
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
It shows footprints/track, how more convincing can that be. Which one? I only see photographs with pointers stating there should be a flag where none can be seen. Alas, why I said they weren't very convincing, they aren't exactly made zoomed down to the details.
|
|
|
Re: Lunar Landing hoax..
[Re: Why_Do_I_Die]
#299045
11/20/09 15:45
11/20/09 15:45
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
OP
Senior Expert
|
OP
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
Btw , mythbusters busted a bunch of the myths surrounding the landing , they tested the shadows , foot prints , flag ect..., and they all got busted. Well, to be honest, they showed how you can get the shadows that are wrong according to the people that believe it didn't happen, but they also admitted there's no way to prove the shadows are correct or fake. You can get the shadows by a variation in height, but it could also be an error. Then again from that test it looked pretty possible to fake the entire picture with models and all that actually. I have to say though, that it's a bit nuts to believe they didn't land on the moon.
|
|
|
Re: Lunar Landing hoax..
[Re: PHeMoX]
#299050
11/20/09 16:24
11/20/09 16:24
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093 Germany
Toast
Serious User
|
Serious User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,093
Germany
|
The mythbusters also had a huge flaw anyway when they did those photo-comparisons. They did such a nice job of getting a ground that reflects about as much as the moon's surface and got this original camera thing. But then they used a digital camera for their photos pretty much ruining lots of the "validity". This video pretty much describes why it was such a sad decision to use a digital camera instead of a comparable film: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBxOmKQwAUI&annotation_id=annotation_828743&feature=ivWhen it comes to do you believe the moon landing was real or not I don't really have an answer yet. There are certain things that are very strange (and I'm not talking about some stupid flag waving which literally gets busted everytime someone approaches this topic to make the hoax theory look stupid) and so I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out that at least the first mission(s) didn't happen but were just media events. Also things like the laser reflector on the moon are no evidence for the landing to happen as said. I don't doubt the equipment is there but it needn't get put there by a human - e.g. look at Russia and their reflector thingy or whatever it was. They put it there remotely... Enjoy your meal Toast
|
|
|
|