Doesnt that mean that climate change IS man-made?

I mean that regardless if the planet is getting hotter or not (I think not),
the evidence that supports "climate change is man made", has been made by man changing the data.

So the PROOF that climate "change is man-made" has been man-made, so climate change IS man-made.
Despite the fact the climate change stopped 10-15 years ago and stable-ised. (how do you spell that?)

Have I made myself clear? I dont quite know how to phrase what I mean.

If the evidence is man-made, therefore the (fictional) theory the evidence supports is also man-made.

That last one sounds better...