AI = Artificial Intelligence, so I have no idea what you mean by "artificial Intelligent based ai".

Also, I have no idea what a spec bot is. Google didn't help either. Can you provide more specific information on what you want to achieve?

3run: Very little of what you said was relevant, and even less was correct.

Jibb

EDIT: Currently, A8 PhysX doesn't appear to have built-in support for breaking objects into smaller pieces.

JulzMighty, all of what I sad is relevant. And even more of it was correct! A7 is 1000000% worst then SOURCE Engine! And it's ODE physics also 1000000% worst then Havok! At the beginning of this topic, we were talking about A7! I don't know anything about the A8! But I hope, it'll be much better than A7! About the AI, I already sent the demo with pathfinding to Random. So, all I do, and all I talk is relevant dude.

@JulzMighty:

Yes, A7's physics is worse than Havok. Is it relevant? No. He's asking about AI. In an AI forum. And he never referenced Havok -- only Counter Strike Source -- a game with no use for advanced physics.

The visual quality of the now-ancient Counter Strike Source can be easily surpassed with A7. Your talk about frame-rate and bad-quality is simply inexperience talking.

Your last post before mine where you offered your help was certainly relevant, and I apologise. I'd left this thread open too long before responding, and didn't refresh to check for more replies, so I missed it.

Jibb

EDIT: lol, Widi... oops...

EDIT2: And the relevance of my own post to the original topic is long-gone now that I only responded to 3run. Sorry. I'm still interested in the kind of features you want for your AI.

Thats right "Woody", underline that and bold please!
JulzMighty, all I sad relevant, since this:
And here I'm telling, there is no way to make better physics with A7! And it is possible to make the same graphics, but with GS, you'll need better PC, to get hight FPS, and on the SOURCE engine, you can even use old laptop, to get stable and nice FPS!

I'm not going to argue with you about those irrelevant points. What he said wasn't a question, it was a preface to his actual question. Regardless of whether or not you agree that he was correct in saying those things, to express your disagreement without having anything to say about the actual topic except "don't know" is actually unhelpful.

Now back to my question: What makes a spec bot a spec bot?

Jibb

I wasn't answering to his question with that! That was my correction. I'm telling him, that is not possible to make something like CSS, with better physics and better graphics on GS! And I answered to him main question as well, so don't try to prove your irrelevant and pointless opinion dude

nah, sorry, but I really hate that ...

@ Rei: Let's keep it civil here. no need to swear at another member or insult them.
@3run: please stay on topic! Arguing with members and going off topic is frustration and causes chaos.
@julz: sorry.....thanks for being patient.

Moderating.

Sorry Blink, my bad. Random, there is a pathfinding demo with simple bot in your PM's.