I didnt like it at first but i dont really play first person shooters for their sense of "depth" at all, I play them to compete with other players at a fairly fast paced tactics/dexterity game. I could care less about the solo play. Thats why people liked the nazi-zombies game so much in COD:WAW that they needed it in black ops too; Because its all about your dexterity/planning the best way to kill the zombies. (the storylines in them are all crap.)

\
EDIT: Although I saw this just before I got on here, thought it was hilarious.

SO REAL.

Watched it before - medium funny.

Sergenant Sergenant Master Sergenant Shooter Person!

Are u kidding? Okay, the multiplayer in the Moder Warfare series is good, but u cant tell me u liked the stories?? Well, matter of taste I guess.
The gameplay however is pretty boring after a while cuz it gets repitive. I mean, sure u played Call of Duty (the original)? It's exactly the same as every following Call of Duty title: Script-based, repitive massacre/corridor shootings gameplay. Exchange the setting, the hero(s), add some more violence to get the medias attention, and voila, there u have one more Call of Duty title.
Honestly, I think thats one series that should find it's end.

Modern Warfare series and other CODs (same as Black Ops) are two different games for me...
I hate all other CODs, they are really template made... But Modern Warfare is just awesome (but yeah, it's matter of taste).
Can you tell me as an example an other game, which ends same spectacle? Except Half Life.

Modern Warfare (2 at least) was really pathetic - not only talking about the storyline, but rather this "scripted cutscene where the main character falls down in slow motion and is then helped up by a friend again" which was there around three dozen times or so. Somehow I felt like an idiot playing this.

So if you say that Modern Warfare is sucks, does that mean that there is no good FPS at all (except Half Life)?

First of all: Nothing IS SUCKS - it DOES SUCK. Sorry for offtopic, and I know that is not your fault because your english simply isnt that good, which is not a bad thing, mine could be better too, so no offense intended, but it just annoys me.

Second:

No, I dont say that there is no good FPS at all.
I would indeed say there are MANY better first person shooter games than Modern Warfare. Even though it is a matter of taste, there are multiple shooters that come to my mind that are WAY better than Modern Warfare in my opinion:

Half Life 2 (cant judge about the first cuz I didnt play it),
ending may be somewhat lame but it is much more atmospheric and just better in so many ways.

Far Cry (first one, the ORIGINAL), AI is much better (and it's years older!!!), general gameplay is much more colorful (stealth, open combat, all that stuff), and although the hero is SUCH a cliché, I can better identify with Jack Carver than with whatever-he-was-called from MW.

Crysis, I KNOW, most people didnt like it, because the gameplay DOES get a bit repitive, and the Alien thing really isnt the most innovative idea, but it offers what makes a good FPS to me: Good AI, GORGEOUS environments, really cool design, a high grade of interactivity (picking up objects, throwing them), and a lot of funny details (coreans peeing in the sea, animals roaming the island...). And, most important, it isnt near as linear as Modern Warfare.

Well, thats just three examples, and most wont agree with me on the Crysis thing, but I could endlessly go on down to XII (which was pretty original), or in the future where really cool titles like Rage, Brink or Bulletstorm are going to add some new fresh taste to the FPS genre.


Oh, and about the MW ending: I cant tell, didnt play through it. I stopped when one of the heroes was killed by the atomic bomb. I cant stand games that kill my hero.

Yeah, my English isn't that good, but that doesn't bother me anyhow
About the examples that you gave:
*Half Life 2 (I said, any other game except Half Life series, or did I say it in some wrong way, so you didn't get me).
*Crisis - this one is just sucks...(don't know does it suck anything) this is kind of game, where you simply need to go from point A to point B, while moving you need to kill everything that moves...
*Far Cry (for me same as the Far Cry 2) - game without sole... same as the game above, simply moving from point A to point B...
The only thing that this games can offer is huge levels.. but that is just nothing against good gameplay.
You said that gameplay in Far Cry is so colorful, stealth blah blah blah...
But the reason you say that, is that you didn't play through all Modern Warfare, there are a lot of stealth and open combats (and other staff). AI is just great (to taste real MW you need to play on hardest difficulty), yeah it can't offer you a huge environment as Crysis, but still levels (and multiplayer maps as well) are just great! And I can say that crysis is very linear...yeah sure, you can move from point A to point B as you wish (via car or by walk) but still that doesn't make sense...