2 registered members (AndrewAMD, juanex),
1,247
guests, and 6
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: Rei_Ayanami]
#420956
04/07/13 15:34
04/07/13 15:34
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,506 Germany
fogman
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,506
Germany
|
+1 (thatīs what meant in the first place)
no science involved
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: Tempelbauer]
#420962
04/07/13 17:13
04/07/13 17:13
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751 Canada
WretchedSid
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751
Canada
|
3.) use the branch-concept to tag stable versions. it should be not only a common libary, but a useable common libary.
Git has support for tags directly, which should be used instead. Branches are better for extra features (eg the inventory system should happen in a secondary branch and be merged back into master once its done). I would also like to see people to use their own forks and submit pull requests instead of giving them direct commit access, obviously that would also imply some kind of peer review by the project maintainer.
Shitlord by trade and passion. Graphics programmer at Laminar Research. I write blog posts at feresignum.com
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: Rei_Ayanami]
#420966
04/07/13 18:04
04/07/13 18:04
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,904
HeelX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,904
|
pls, pls, pls... Add a meaningful prefix to all files and functions, maybe "tust" I would highly recommend using a standard prefix in front of each function, even if they got their own prefixes. It is funny: in the moment someone wants to build something code related, everyone gets uneasy about coding- and naming conventions. My advice for you would be to take it easy and work in short, but intensive sprints. Everyone gets a task to write this and that in the next 2-4 weeks and then you invest one week into refactoring and making it pretty and stable. Then you release it.
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: WretchedSid]
#420983
04/08/13 06:01
04/08/13 06:01
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,993 Karlsruhe
PadMalcom
Serious User
|
Serious User
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,993
Karlsruhe
|
OT: I wonder if the decentralized structure is the only big "advantage" of git. If yes, I don't like it The idea of branching, merging and RCs is not new and for SVN management there exist better tools. I uploaded a simple inventory and a logging library. Movement code is next!
Last edited by PadMalcom; 04/08/13 09:36.
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: PadMalcom]
#420997
04/08/13 13:04
04/08/13 13:04
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751 Canada
WretchedSid
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751
Canada
|
OT: I wonder if the decentralized structure is the only big "advantage" of git. No, but it's one of the key features that make it much more flexible than SVN. And you don't have to put advantage in quotes, it is a tremendous advantage over SVN
Shitlord by trade and passion. Graphics programmer at Laminar Research. I write blog posts at feresignum.com
|
|
|
Re: TUST or "The community library"
[Re: PadMalcom]
#421064
04/09/13 12:33
04/09/13 12:33
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751 Canada
WretchedSid
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,751
Canada
|
Damn old people!
Shitlord by trade and passion. Graphics programmer at Laminar Research. I write blog posts at feresignum.com
|
|
|
|