I am trying to use as little lines of code as possible, as anyone would. So instead of having two lines of code for wait_for() i combined it into 1 like so:

Example A:


Example B:


but example B doesn't work. It just skips to the next line of code and immediately removes the entity.

Any thoughts? .. Or is this just not allowed, even with lite-c.

Have you tried using normal 'while' loop instead of 'for' one? Also, try to set '150' inside of the function, just to make sure everything works at the first place (var i = 150;).

Greets

I had it as a while loop before this. I was trying to save myself 2 lines of code (no i -= 1, and no wait will be needed when I add the actual code to it).

It works in example A. So Im sure Its not the for loop...

I miss understood you at the first place. And I think it's not going to work, cause you have to know how 'wait_for' actually looks like:
As you can see, it just checks if there is any running functions with the given function pointer (f), so your idea isn't going to work anyway. Cause having multiply running 'wait_time(150)' functions will stop all those 'wait_for', waiting till all 'wait_time' functions will end. Better insert 'while(i > 0)' loop right before the 'ent_remove', don't make thing too complicated where they should be simple

Greets

Edit: two lines

Thanks 3Run
I noticed it likely wasn't going to work when the engine ignored my command, but was not issuing an error.
Either way, as long as it works

I like your approach, in your example.