|
|
Re: Votes for future features
[Re: boatman]
#477872
08/09/19 00:39
08/09/19 00:39
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 101
OptimusPrime
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 101
|
Hi Team:
I appreciate the NEURAL and such features in Zorro. My request is to expand the functionality as follows:
- Provide a default Levenburg Marquadt neural network file with deep learning topology (e.g 2 Hidden Layers) and parameters *preconfigured * as a generic file in the Zorro folder. ( Basically a preconfigured Neural Network file or dll like some apps use today. )
- Allow the User to easily load this configured neural network file in the script, then specify inputs as usual, and train it, with Zorro saving the determined weights in a copy of the Net (the trained Net under some provided filena,e) and then easily use it in the future by specifying the trained Net name in a script. So long as it is in the root folder, Zorro will load it ( the trained weights are already in the file.)
- This will give users an easier way to work with a defined Topology without having to deal with the nitty gritty code configuration. Maybe even the ability to train and save multiple networks under different filenames for later retrieval.
- This would eliminate the painpoint of having to install any packages or frameworks, etc like I have to do today.
- In time, maybe even expand the list of available pre-configured Topologies in the root folder (TDNN, etc) so that all we would be doing in our script essentially is selecting which NN type we want and letting the training determine the weights.. all within the existing framework for selecting DTREE or NEURAL today.
The net benefit is ease of utilizing advanced and known Topologies as well as training, saving, and retrieving your Net. For instance, if I ran some solid training sessions and saved my work, I could retain the best 10 nets as 10 files (delete the others) in my root folder so that I can load up anyone I want in the script just by typing the corresponding file name.
With thanks, OptimusPrime
Last edited by OptimusPrime; 08/09/19 00:44.
Thanks so much,
OptimusPrime
|
|
|
Re: Votes for future features
[Re: boatman]
#478902
01/09/20 16:44
01/09/20 16:44
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 7 Netherlands
DavidB1969
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 7
Netherlands
|
I'd like to cast a vote for a solution in the MT4 bridge, to prevent mix up of comments and magic #'s when trading multiple strategies.
Thank you.
Last edited by DavidB1969; 01/09/20 21:16.
|
|
|
Re: Votes for future features
[Re: boatman]
#478990
02/02/20 09:02
02/02/20 09:02
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 98
7th_zorro
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 98
|
.t6 file system is good, but there is thousands of stock tickers in the markets. If someone try to save stock history price datas to .t6 files, maybe thousands of files needed in one folder. This cause extra efforts to manage data. To resolve this problem, I kindly suggest HDF5 database support to save historical price data. Using this database format, we can write all stocks historical data to a one file.
And also there is not enough room to save historical datas to a only one folder, I recommand that zorro can recognize sub-directories of history folder.
Last edited by 7th_zorro; 02/02/20 09:07.
|
|
|
|