|
Re: Corrupted Z12.trd?
[Re: DdlV]
#483685
07/08/21 17:38
07/08/21 17:38
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
DdlV
OP
Serious User
|
OP
Serious User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
|
Thanks @jcl. That puts the size reduction is in the same ballpark, so I'll give the tiny trd a try.
FYI, I save a copy of the trd file most every weekend. I tested starting Zorro (in a test environment, not live) with these backups, and had to go back a number of weeks to find an un-corrupted trd. Zorro ran continuously over that period, and the weekly trd files have different sizes. Since Zorro was never stopped and restarted, the trd file was apparently never read - only written to. Unfortunately, especially given the passage of time, I have no hope of correlating the corruption to anything else. But from these circumstances a reasonable suspicion could be a rare pointer/buffer problem in Zorro?
HTH.
|
|
|
Re: Corrupted Z12.trd?
[Re: DdlV]
#483688
07/09/21 01:26
07/09/21 01:26
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
DdlV
OP
Serious User
|
OP
Serious User
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,609
|
@jcl: The saga continues. The tiny trd allowed Z12 to start. But:
a) Intermingled with the "resumed" messages were a number of "closed" messages. The "closed" messages were all for real trades, and all exactly 1 lot. Is this expected?
b) After the "resumed" messages came a slew of Trails, Stops, and Longs. I assume this is normal as Z12 adjusts to the new market conditions it finds? (Although without the benefit of the missing AlgoVars...)
c) Lastly, the net result of the above seems to be that the account balance being reported by Zorro is accurate, the number of open trades matches the number of open positions in the broker's web interface, but Zorro's view of the value of these open positions, including which are winning vs. losing, is incorrect. Is anything to be done?
FYI, the trd file has grown from 12k to 57k.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|