Quote:
Urey-Miller to start. Its been admitted for a long time that he used highly exaggerated conditions and still couldn't get all of the amino acids to start life.
We know that ultraviolet rays would destroy early life.
I think you are bit unclear as to what the purpose of the experiment was, and what the conclusions were:
"Miller and Urey observed that as much as 10-15% of the carbon within the system was now in the form of organic compounds. Two percent of the carbon had formed amino acids, including 13 of the 21 that are used to make proteins in living cells, with glycine as the most abundant....the Miller-Urey experiment, and all subsequent experiments, succeeded in creating right- and left-handed amino acids in roughly a 50/50 ratio."
This is a general description of the results.. I dont how see in any way, shape or form this somehow disproves that life could have arisen this way.
This seems like your usual method of taking good evidence for naturalistic evolution, and twisting it to support your own opposite theory.
PLeas explain yourself.
| 
