the spiritual soul is a philosophical issue 100% and has nothing to do with science at all. so i dont see the connection.

-->..Then you glue the two pieces togheter the microrganism starts living again..

i also dont see how this proofs or disproofs a soul in any way. since its not scientific it cant be done this way to start with.

if you cut a finger from a human being he still can live and he still can have his soul. if you transplant all his inner organs its the same. even if his brain fails to work anymore this doesnt mean he is dead nor does it mean he loses his "sould" from the spiritual view.
as the tobacco virus i dont see any connection here.


-->..Classic philosophy we have been taught at school claim that there are animal and human kind of souls

i havent heared that so far. nor do have other ancient cultures like native amaricans, greeks aso. the spirit and sould within any living creature is part of the whole system of existence.
take the native americans or indian (the presenst country india)...their religion sets the "soul" and spirit of animals equal to the humans. reincarnation as an animal is an honor and their spirits are vital parts of their lives.
the represent human attitiudes like strenghts, wisedom aso.


-->..Getting better to the big bang however it is in favour of the existence of a creator, in my opinion..

the problem starts with the simple slogan "i WANT to believe!". even if we ever find strong and unchangable facts for a cosmical big bang and the absence of some creator, this will never stop sentences like "yes, but god faked all of this that way so he can keep unnoticable".

right now creationist use this same analogy with age dating methods or the ange of the earth in general. this is no argument at all and cant be prooved or disprooved so its not scientific in the first place.

religion is a matter of believe and science a matter of facts. but you will need both at the same time to make one of them work.

a spiritual mind without knowledge is lost as well as the smartest mind is useless without a ethical/religious/spiritual (call it how you like) guide.


i think "and god created all mankind" should be rewritten into "and all mankind created god" (this is not ment negative at all!)
from the philosophical point of view that just means that all living forms are more then just biological, working constructions. believing into a higher level of existence then presence is the difference between us and a stone.

so whatever you do, whatever you investigate, try to create or invent is more then the fact that you can do it.