Hilbert's Hotel
Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum...
Discussing Infinity:
theism and atheism, prime numbers, immortality, cosmology, philosophy...
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
3,370
guests, and 6
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Big Bang
[Re: Matt_Aufderheide]
#84706
08/26/06 10:48
08/26/06 10:48
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 246
Alberto
OP
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 246
|
Quote:
you can only predict what you cant see, not assume. The idea that the Universe is just all that we can see from Earth is bound to be false.
Well , you should should reject 99 % of science discoveries, then !!!
If billions galaxies are moving away from earth and just a few of them are getting closer it is defintly unlikely that the situation is different in the remote part of universe
However the expansion of universe is also supported by the theory of relativity, up to a certain extent,even though it is not the unique solution of the Einstein's cosmology equation
According to the theory of relativity , space is not just an empty box, rather it is a sort of protuberation of matter
Imagine some ants (the galaxies) walking on the surface of a ball (The space)
If the radius of the ball increases than also the distance among the ants alwayes increase even though the ants move to random directions
This is the reason why some galaxies move away at a speed higher than the speed of the light The speed limit does not take into account the deformation of the space
Beside an non uniform deformation of the space, is not consistent, as far as I know with the theory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|