0 registered members (),
1,459
guests, and 9
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: The future of the big bang
[Re: Alberto]
#89530
09/17/06 15:16
09/17/06 15:16
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
Lol, is it just me, or are you talking as if you think that democracy isn't fair...? Hehehe Scientists are well aware of the possibilty they may be wrong, being totally wrong or just wrong in some aspects of their theory. However, when a theory get's widely accepted amongst the vast majority of scientists, then usually there are good reasons for it. I seriously doubt the credibility of any "scientist" not believing the evolution theory. It's not that it's mandatory to believe it in order to be a true scientist or anything, but how could a scientist not believe in it? Okey, mainly because I agree with the evidence in favor of it, but still I don't think a (true) scientist could deny it's the most logical way of things considered all the evidence. Cheers
|
|
|
Re: The future of the big bang
[Re: PHeMoX]
#89531
09/17/06 20:04
09/17/06 20:04
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 718 Wisconsin
Irish_Farmer
User
|
User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 718
Wisconsin
|
Maybe, if there were a method by which it could happen (mutations are out....the best they do is horizontal change). Maybe if the fossils supported it. Maybe if the DNA comparisons supported it. Then if/when I get into the science field I might accept it. Who knows, maybe they'll find some evidence that overturns the past 150 years of not finding evidence. Anything's possible.
"The task force finds that...the unborn child is a whole human being from the moment of fertilization, that all abortions terminate the life of a human being, and that the unborn child is a separate human patient under the care of modern medicine."
|
|
|
Re: The future of the big bang
[Re: Alberto]
#89533
09/23/06 11:29
09/23/06 11:29
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
Matt_Aufderheide
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,131
|
Quote:
Maybe, if there were a method by which it could happen (mutations are out....the best they do is horizontal change).
Maybe if the fossils supported it.
Maybe if the DNA comparisons supported it. Then if/when I get into the science field I might accept it.
Irish just denying facts doesnt make you right.. its hard to take you seriously.
|
|
|
The Best phentermine and Tramdol Directory on Web *DELETED*
[Re: jcl]
#89534
09/23/06 13:35
09/23/06 13:35
|
Anonymous
OP
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
OP
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
Re: The Best phentermine and Tramdol Directory on
#89535
09/23/06 20:21
09/23/06 20:21
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 718 Wisconsin
Irish_Farmer
User
|
User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 718
Wisconsin
|
Actually, Matt. There was apparently an experiment done a few years ago where some evolutionary biologists combined mutations to see what affects they would have (in other words finally putting neo-darwinism to the test), and apparently it failed miserably. But before I would go more in depth on that one I want to read the experiment a bit more. Its rather lengthy.
"The task force finds that...the unborn child is a whole human being from the moment of fertilization, that all abortions terminate the life of a human being, and that the unborn child is a separate human patient under the care of modern medicine."
|
|
|
Re: The future of the big bang
[Re: Irish_Farmer]
#89536
09/24/06 12:25
09/24/06 12:25
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177 Netherlands
PHeMoX
Senior Expert
|
Senior Expert
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
|
Quote:
Maybe, if there were a method by which it could happen (mutations are out....the best they do is horizontal change).
Maybe if the fossils supported it.
Maybe if the DNA comparisons supported it. Then if/when I get into the science field I might accept it.
Who knows, maybe they'll find some evidence that overturns the past 150 years of not finding evidence. Anything's possible.
Right ... and the bible and church have all kinds of evidences supporting your view I suppose? Funny ...
Infact, as far as I know quite the contrary is true, fossils do back-up the general theories, same goes for DNA. I've been thinking about it, but I don't quite understand how they could totally contradict any part of the theory, would you care to explain please?
Cheers
|
|
|
|