Quote:
Infact if a God placed all animals on this earth, then why did he gave them similar DNA?
Well, I know there's the typical, "What would animals eat if we weren't all similar?" argument.
But really, if DNA is going to describe life, then all animals should have DNA. Now, let's say that God 'writes the code' for skin. If He needs to put skin on another animal, unless that animal has other basic requirements for their epidermis, then He'll probably use similar DNA for that animal's skin.
What we should expect is that DNA should be similar. It would just be a consequence of good design, in my opinion. In fact, I think the DNA similarities fit the design hypothesis best, but since design is unacceptable in the scientific community, they have to twist it to make it look like it fits their hypothesis better.
You can disagree with that, but I don't know how much more can be said.
"The task force finds that...the unborn child is a whole human being from the moment of fertilization, that all abortions terminate the life of a human being, and that the unborn child is a separate human patient under the care of modern medicine."
| 
