why does .c and .wdl have different results when compiled?

Posted By: pewpew

why does .c and .wdl have different results when compiled? - 10/30/08 01:37

i am currently working in SED with .c due to the .wdl format disliking quite a few commands...
is .c for c-lite and .wdl for C-script?
Posted By: Uhrwerk

Re: why does .c and .wdl have different results when compiled? - 10/30/08 01:42

Absolutely right. Be carefull. Files with .c extension are always handled as if they contain lite-c code. The same with the wdl. extension. SED has also the bad habbit to save files with the .wdl extension by default. Be sure to save a .c when using lite-c. I've heard rumors of several people gone mad because of this trap ... wink

Lite-c is even the future of 3DGS. I guess C-Script will be abandoned over short or long. Additionally only lite-c can be compiled to an executable file and executes much faster than c script.
Posted By: GamerX

Re: why does .c and .wdl have different results when compiled? - 10/30/08 01:50

Yea you definitely have a chance of going "crazy", been there done that lol.
© 2023 lite-C Forums