Plus it looks like Crytek maybe use this:

Quote:

---

The method presented in this paper is also related to the method described in US patent application no. US 2003/0112237A1, filed by Marco Corbetta on behalf of Crytek GmbH in December 2001. The two methods were developed independently

---

thread theft is a crime, but I would gladly pay for a blender plug/py. I also use modo(102), but would rather have the features you described for blender..just think it is better suited and it's free, so no one gets alienated.

what makes me curious is only 176 user gave their vote here. every other one dont care at all?

Before I talk about future features I like to get a bug fixed working version.

I agree with you totally.

I vote for 2D improvements. Why not make a special level format for 2D games by eliminating the z axis but allow all other functions, like collision detection?

vertex weighting, would make import of models to med, who are rigged and modelled in maya/max easier...

also, would make ragdolls better possible if the bones system would be updated with a code in which you can directly set a bone point to a specified point

(
kinda like vec_set, but maybe bone_set then

bone_set(entity, string_bone_name, vector_position)

that would be very usefull!
)

regards,

We need vertex weighting along with importing bones animation for our project, this is the only thing holding us back from adding in good animations.

I voted for vertex weighting, becource:
1) Higher res models animations looks silly without.
2) If FXB support is implemented it should be able to handle this-for users of a better modelling packed it is actually crap to import bone animated models.

(later)

Ello, well most people are looking for the imediate reward(e.g. somthing they don't have to code IMHO). I think Useability, stability, cust service, and new engine features with new commands are the best thing...,but that's only my opinion.