Quote:

---

Toward the middle of the project, once the major elements were in place and the game could be played most of the way through, it became mostly a matter of fine-tuning. To do this, we added basic instrumentation to the game, automatically recording the player’s position, health, weapons, time, and any major activities such as saving the game, dying, being hurt, solving a puzzle, fighting a monster, and so on. We then took the results from a number of sessions and graphed them together to find any areas where there were problems. These included areas where the player spent too long without any encounters (boring), too long with too much health (too easy), too long with too little health (too hard), all of which gave us a good idea as to where they were likely to die and which positions would be best for adding goodies.

---

Quote:

---

During the Cabal process, we realized that although the level designers knew of the feature, they really had no clear idea of what it was for. The parameters were all very cryptic, and the wrong combinations would cause the beams to have very ugly-looking effects. There were no decent textures to apply to them, and setting them up was a bit of a mystery. It became very clear the technology itself was only a small part of the work and integration, training, and follow-through were absolutely necessary to make the technology useful to the game. Writing the code was typically less than half the problem.

---

Quote:

---

When I told them that i need a documentation, they agressively told me, that they
explained the trigger orally a while ago, and we should remember them.

---

Ahhh, it's a shame we can't beat our workers anymore.
If anyone working with me said that, they would be off the team SO fast... especially in light of the perfectly logical and reasonable request you proposed.

Quote:

---

One of the strong points they mentioned, was to have PlayTesters testing the game and new features
during development.
The Developers where not allowed to interact with the Testers, and only set up the game, and monitor
their Problems.

This of course is the most objective method to value new features, and resolve
personal opinions within the development.
But its also quite costly.

---

Although, I doubt that the tester feel comfortable while playing the game!

I don't think it is costly. We shouldn't mix up the job 'tester' who has to search for bugs and find reliable ways to repeat the bug with that testers that they mean: those are simply guys who like to play such a game, and I guess you find enough people who enjoy playing a game in development without getting anything payed.

The team of Crysis did such tests each second to fourth week, too.