ye, but #PRAGMA_PATH "...." doesn't work in lite-c. Any ideas how can I include C-script in Lite-c , except the way with the WDL file named as the executable ?
If you are a beginner, the answer is clear. At a first glance both languages look very similar but you'll soon notice that lite-C is much easier to learn and start with. It makes no sense for a beginner to use the old WDL and learn all its special complicated limitations.
But if you are an experienced programmer and already have a large library of WDL code, then it may make sense to continue with WDL.
You can not include WDL in lite-C.
Re: wdl VS c-script
[Re: Petra]
#279034 07/16/0913:1607/16/0913:16
I'd say that C-script is easier than Lite-C for someone without any programming experience, but I'll recommend learning Lite-C instead as C-Script will be "phased out", and probably not included in A8.