2 registered members (ChrstphFr, AndrewAMD),
868
guests, and 5
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: The big Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac topic
[Re: Redeemer]
#304970
01/12/10 10:43
01/12/10 10:43
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 133 Germany, Passau
AlexDeloy
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 133
Germany, Passau
|
I cannot tell you how many times my Dad has had to re-setup our main Windows family machine. He would use the best firewall, and he even setup two outer firewalls, but year after year we got hit with viruses.
Don't blame whatever OS, sounds a bit like your dads fault to me Everybody should choose the OS he/she is content with. Anyway I'm a windows guy because - Linux will never be THE gaming platform, not all vendors would like to open their drivers, as a developer you should stick with your clients platform
- MS Office is still THE standard office solution
- my MCSA degree would be useless
Oh nonetheless I use debian on a few webservers, for this purpose it's perfect
|
|
|
Re: The big Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac topic
[Re: AlexDeloy]
#304987
01/12/10 13:58
01/12/10 13:58
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,660 North America
Redeemer
OP
Serious User
|
OP
Serious User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,660
North America
|
Don't blame whatever OS, sounds a bit like your dads fault to me Did I mention every other internet-enabled PC in the house was running Linux, and hasn't been hit once? This Windows machine is the only thing with the problem, and it's not like he hasn't looked into it. The trouble is, as good as our firewall is, it ultimately just delays the virus problem. The system has simply less viruses, because virus programmers want to target the more popular platforms (Windows), and there are more Windoes platforms that can spread the viruses. You have a point here, but that's not really the problem. You see, Linux uses a much different file structure than Windows, such that every file on your PC uses permissions. For example, if a user runs an application, he can only modify a text file if the user owns the the text file as well. Even if a virus landed on your Linux machine, it wouldn't be able to do anything since it doesn't "own" any of your files. The whole kernel would just reject it. Windows doesn't have this; if a virus lands on your machine, it can do anything, anywhere. You're totally defenseless.
|
|
|
Re: The big Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac topic
[Re: Redeemer]
#305026
01/12/10 16:55
01/12/10 16:55
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,771 Bay City, MI
lostclimate
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,771
Bay City, MI
|
The second reason Windows dominates the market is the fact that nobody is willing to learn the better system, that is Linux. The trouble with the average electronics consumer is that he/she is unwilling to spend time to figure out his/her device before he runs off with it and loads it up with viruses. People like devices like iPods and iPhones because they are so simple to use
while that is true, I dont believe there is anything wrong with it. Thats about the equivilent of saying people are dumb for using c++ instead of assembly because you could theoretically make your programs exponentially more efficient with assembly... But it would take forever, and the dev time itself would be ineffecient. Inefficiencies have several forms, whether its taking time you dont have to learn to use linux when you have a perfectly good option with windows, or spending time searching for linux software... It's not always strictly about what "could be better". You also add the "loads it with viruses", now this is an issue I've been arguing about with peopl for a long time because It's not my fault if you (not you specifically, I'm referring to most people) are too retarded to keep your computer free of viruses, and even if you get them, reinstalling windows and drivers takes 45 minutes tops, so just keep an extra partition with your important shit on it and your good. Even with linux, I recommend reformatting once in a while just strictly for the "making everything new without much effort" factor. Even if you don't, I put together my best friends pc about 1.5 years ago.... he has NO VIRUS PROTECTION WHATSOEVER.... but he's also not an idiot and so he hasnt had any real issues with it yet.... I have avg.... I never scan like I should... but then again I'm not some idiot who doesnt know how to keep viruses off my pc so it still runs fine. point being, yes there are viruses for windows... just dont get them! and yes, people are too lazy to learn things some times... and sometimes they just dont have the time, and thats perfectly fine.
|
|
|
Re: The big Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac topic
[Re: Redeemer]
#305081
01/12/10 20:33
01/12/10 20:33
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,381 New Brunswick, Canada
Ayrus
Serious User
|
Serious User
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,381
New Brunswick, Canada
|
You have a point here, but that's not really the problem. You see, Linux uses a much different file structure than Windows, such that every file on your PC uses permissions. For example, if a user runs an application, he can only modify a text file if the user owns the the text file as well. Even if a virus landed on your Linux machine, it wouldn't be able to do anything since it doesn't "own" any of your files. The whole kernel would just reject it. Windows doesn't have this; if a virus lands on your machine, it can do anything, anywhere. You're totally defenseless.
While yes, linux does use a very different structure, that isn't what makes it more secure... you can actually do this with windows (If you want to) too. Permissions are pervasive in any os nowadays. As to viruses on linux, they do exist, but not in the sense that they do on windows. The kernel of linux is more secure yes, but every layer on top of the kernel that is added is inherently less secure than the last. So, the trick to writing a linux virus is to not attack the kernel, instead you attack the GUI (Gnome, KDE, xFCE). It can be done, and proofs do exist for this, however, since linux is such a small portion of the market, it is not exploited the way that would be and is with windows. As to being totally defenseless in windows, if you take the time, you can lock files down to a comparable level as linux, yes there are still going to be more holes, but thats simply because more people exert their efforts in attacking windows and not linux (Although linux servers are popular choices for C&C [Command and control] Servers for botnets). Regards, Ayrus
suprised my account is still active....
|
|
|
Re: The big Windows vs. Linux vs. Mac topic
[Re: Ayrus]
#305106
01/12/10 23:15
01/12/10 23:15
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,713 Lübeck
Slin
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,713
Lübeck
|
I love my windows 7 computer and I also love my mac mini with now finally Snow Leopard (which is btw very cheap...). Both run very fast and very stable and while I prefer the preinstalled software on the mac and the developement tools of it over what I´ve got on my windows computer, I use windows for playing games and gamestudio and I really enjoy it currently. Of course also because one notices the 4gb ram vs the macs 2gb as well as the i5 vs the core2duo. While currently the win7 taskbars highlighting when turning off the fancy stuff, which is actually needed for some software I use, it is pretty hard to create a new folder on the mac if the finder window shows the files in detailed mode if the folder is full, as there is no free space to click at, which you would need. xCode btw doesn´t seem to offer a really working save all function, instead you have to rebuild to get asked if you want to save all...
I once had ubuntu installed and I may will install it somewhen again, or another linux distro. I liked it but messed around with my hardware I had back then and thus sometimes took hours to start. And I relied quite a bit on the internet with it, to find and get all the things I needed as well as the many updates there were, which is not so great if your internet is as slow as mine. I also didn´t get used to it the way I am used to windows or mac, but I may would also need some more time with it.
|
|
|
|