Make no mistake, failure is absolutely a direct consequence of giving up. I mean think about it, you're either failing or succeeding, and you're certainly not succeeding by giving up.

I just want to make sure that everyone understands that this is NOT my fault here!

Sure!
Confess!
You'll get the comfy chair!

i could write a story bout powerboats on par with cars. problem is cars sucked

Although our game would not have been the best ever made with 3dgs, it certainly would have ranked in the top 100 (top 50 perhaps) made with a7. The game would have had some features that have never been seen in 3dgs games before like icebergs in a 3d water world. Of course that all takes a lot of work and we decided not to go ahead with the project in the end as we did not have enough time at the end of the day left for developing the project. Anyway I am done talking about this project, we are remaking/renaming our studio, we will now have 2 less members working with us, and we will focus on making some good games. NO PROMISES THIS TIME...

Woohoo! I'm not sure if this is something I should look forward to...

I want this so bad. Seriously.

It wouldnt be extremely hard to make but the 3d water would probably cause most of the problems. The icebergs are pretty easy to make and so are the physics. Just the water part is quite difficult and if you want good quality water you will probably have to make your own shader.

I highly recommend you do learn how to write your own shaders. It doesn't take much time at all to be able to do your own tweaks and even simple effects, and then it won't be long after that until you're learning more complex effects.

Many users who don't know how to write shaders avoid trying out of intimidation -- the assumption that shaders are difficult. The thing is, most shaders are short (they need to be fast, right?). They use relatively simple maths (except for some "standard" matrix operations that are the same in almost all shaders). And they are visual.

Jibb

And that´s why I love them!