Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
Help with plotting multiple ZigZag
by degenerate_762. 04/30/24 23:23
M1 Oversampling
by 11honza11. 04/30/24 08:16
Trading Journey
by howardR. 04/28/24 09:55
Zorro Trader GPT
by TipmyPip. 04/27/24 13:50
Data from CSV not parsed correctly
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:18
Why Zorro supports up to 72 cores?
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:09
Eigenwerbung
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:08
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
The Bible Game
A psychological thriller game
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (PeroPero), 879 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
wandaluciaia, Mega_Rod, EternallyCurious, howardR, 11honza11
19049 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective #486035
06/02/22 18:27
06/02/22 18:27
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline OP
User
Zheka  Offline OP
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
If no parameter combination produces a 'positive' value for objective in a specific WFO cycle, i would like to skip trades in the oos test period for such cycle.

This is probably possible to achieve by parsing the objective from .par files and then determining whether to trade or not, but having such functionality out-of-the-box would be very helpful.

Thank you.

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective [Re: Zheka] #486038
06/03/22 06:25
06/03/22 06:25
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Rather than parsing .par files, store and read the objectives with putvar / getvar. There is also an undocumented variable "ObjectiveLong" and "ObjectiveShort", but since it's undocumented I don't know if it does exactly what you want.

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective [Re: Zheka] #486042
06/03/22 12:27
06/03/22 12:27
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline OP
User
Zheka  Offline OP
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Isn't this useful broadly enough to warrant adding to Zorro's out-of-the-box (or even default) functionality?

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective [Re: Zheka] #486043
06/03/22 12:40
06/03/22 12:40
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
I have no idea for what it could be useful. But we will still implement it when it is backed by other users.

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective [Re: Zheka] #486045
06/03/22 14:09
06/03/22 14:09
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Z
Zheka Offline OP
User
Zheka  Offline OP
User
Z

Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 784
Then, what's your conceptual thinking on the subject?

Why do you think this is irrelevant?

Re: FR: a flag to exclude wfo cycles w negative objective [Re: Zheka] #486046
06/03/22 14:56
06/03/22 14:56
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 294
Netherlands
G
Grant Offline
Member
Grant  Offline
Member
G

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 294
Netherlands
I like the idea of this 'penalty' method and it might result in a better alpha, provided that you use wide parameter ranges.

Last edited by Grant; 06/03/22 17:15.

Moderated by  Petra 

Gamestudio download | chip programmers | Zorro platform | shop | Data Protection Policy

oP group Germany GmbH | Birkenstr. 25-27 | 63549 Ronneburg / Germany | info (at) opgroup.de

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1