Hilbert's Hotel

Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum...
Discussing Infinity: theism and atheism, prime numbers, immortality, cosmology, philosophy...

Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
Help with plotting multiple ZigZag
by degenerate_762. 04/30/24 23:23
M1 Oversampling
by 11honza11. 04/30/24 08:16
Trading Journey
by howardR. 04/28/24 09:55
Zorro Trader GPT
by TipmyPip. 04/27/24 13:50
Data from CSV not parsed correctly
by jcl. 04/26/24 11:18
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
The Bible Game
A psychological thriller game
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (AndrewAMD), 946 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
firatv, wandaluciaia, Mega_Rod, EternallyCurious, howardR
19050 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes #77801
06/15/06 02:51
06/15/06 02:51
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,813
U.S.
Nadester Offline OP

Expert
Nadester  Offline OP

Expert

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,813
U.S.
I was reading up the other day on Einstein's theory of relativity (which, as you know, has been tested) - particularly time travel paradoxes. A little background on the original experiment:

Quote:

In 1975, Professor Carrol Alley tested Einstein's theory using two synchronised atomic clocks. Carol loaded one clock onto a plane, which was flown for several hours, while the other clock remained on the ground. At the end of its flight, the clock on the plane was slightly behind the one on the ground. Time had actually slowed down for the clock on the plane. It had travelled forward in time.




Picture this: A person is in a train without any walls. Another person is standing outside the train. There is a flashlight on the floor of the train facing the ceiling. The train drives by the person standing outside the train. Hypothetically speaking, the person not on the train sees the light move dialognally (assuming the train was going VERY fast), while the person inside the train, relative to the motion of the train, ONLY sees the light move straight up. Thus, the person on the ouside, sees the light moving a further distance in the same amount of time as the person on the inside of the train (picture a right triangle). Now, keep in mind, light CANNOT be accelerated, the speed of light is a constant. So, how is it possible that the light moves a greater velocity in the same amount of time? This is because time slows down for the person inside the train. Freaky concept?

From the Pythagorean Theorem, the equation can be derived:

T = t1 / sqrt( 1 - ( ( x * c^2) / c^2 ) )

Where T = time of the object at rest, t1 = time of the moving object, c = the speed of light, and x = a variable to gauge how close the velocity is to the speed of light. (Note that the c^2's cancel out).

Now, say the train is going 99% the speed of light, thus x is .99. Time for the person on the train, t1, is 1 year. Plug it in. You'll find that time itself on Earth has passed by 7 years. Weird, eh? Now, try .999 - 20 years. .9999 - 70 years.

Now, even creepier - say you are going the speed of light. Plug it into the equation: sqrt(1-1) = 0. 1 / 0 = undefined. Undefined = infinity. The universe has literally ended, an infinite amout of time has past - time becomes irrelevent to you.

Continuing, what would happen if you go beyond the speed of light? While this appears to a barrier in our universe, if you CAN go beyond it, the opposite would happen - time would slow down to a reverse.

Lastly: The paradox. Imagine I discover a way to go beyond the speed of light, and I travel back in time. The year is 1970. My father in a senior in high school. I walk up to him, pull out a shotgun, and shoot him dead. Poof - I disappear, as my father was never allive to meet my mother, and thus I cease to ever have existed. But wait: If I havn't existed - then who could have shot my dad? Which means he'd still be allive, which means I'd be born, which means I'd go back in time and shoot him, which means I'd never have existed! Freaky? I think so.

That's all I have. Correct me if I'm made any mistakes, and please share any other paradoxes


--Eric
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: Nadester] #77802
06/15/06 11:34
06/15/06 11:34
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
jcl Offline

Chief Engineer
jcl  Offline

Chief Engineer

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,986
Frankfurt
Going back in time isn't so easy because of the light speed limit. However, it's nevertheless possible under certain assumptions. Goedel has proven this in the 1940s.

One of the assumptions is that you have a strong rotating gravity field. If the field is strong enough and rotates fast enough, there are closed paths that take you not only through space, but also through time - even backwards.

Still, there is no paradoxon. You can not go back and kill your father. The reason is that when you go back with the above method, you also need to move in space - so you end up at a position so far from you father's location that you'd need a gun with a bullet faster than light to kill him. And this, according to relativity theory, is impossible.

Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: jcl] #77803
06/15/06 12:27
06/15/06 12:27
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,134
Netherlands
Joozey Offline
Expert
Joozey  Offline
Expert

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,134
Netherlands
Quote:


Still, there is no paradoxon. You can not go back and kill your father. The reason is that when you go back with the above method, you also need to move in space - so you end up at a position so far from you father's location that you'd need a gun with a bullet faster than light to kill him. And this, according to relativity theory, is impossible.





Never thought about that, it makes sense .
Thanx for this explanation! Lol


Click and join the 3dgs irc community!
Room: #3dgs
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: Joozey] #77804
06/15/06 12:47
06/15/06 12:47
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,174
Israel, Haifa
ROMAC Offline
Expert
ROMAC  Offline
Expert

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,174
Israel, Haifa
Quote:

Still, there is no paradoxon. You can not go back and kill your father. The reason is that when you go back with the above method, you also need to move in space - so you end up at a position so far from you father's location that you'd need a gun with a bullet faster than light to kill him. And this, according to relativity theory, is impossible.



What if it was a circular motion, wouldn't you then be closer to your father?

Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: ROMAC] #77805
06/15/06 13:52
06/15/06 13:52
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
I guess you can only go very very very fast when going in a straight line from one point to another. A human being would not survive the G-forces of a circular motion at the required speed, so basically going in one line seems to me the only way it's possible...

Cheers


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: PHeMoX] #77806
06/15/06 16:31
06/15/06 16:31
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,541
Berlin
EX Citer Offline
Expert
EX Citer  Offline
Expert

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,541
Berlin
Did I understood that right? By moving the time changes? I mean the clock on the airplane could be slower because its pretty cold up there, and the colder it is the slower things go. But that is no change of time(?)

In anyway, what I am realy woundering about. Planets are moving realy fast and realy slow. And (their) movement depends from the view of other objects, what means there is no real speed. From point of view of itself itīs not moving. But time is going on. All planets time is going the same (or am I wrong). Doesnīt matter if you are on the moon or earth. But moon and earth move with different speed. And what about the sun. Itīs not moving(?) but it is reacting real fast with all itīs burnings and explosions. So why isnīt the suns time = 0?yeah, yeah, I know. The sun is moving for sure. But still itīs time is going same as on earth I guess when I watch these explosions there. In these movies they look slow because are so big and far away. Like watching the horizon when driving.


:L
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: EX Citer] #77807
06/15/06 17:28
06/15/06 17:28
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,011
South Africa
capanno Offline
Serious User
capanno  Offline
Serious User

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,011
South Africa
Quote:

In 1975, Professor Carrol Alley tested Einstein's theory using two synchronised atomic clocks. Carol loaded one clock onto a plane, which was flown for several hours, while the other clock remained on the ground. At the end of its flight, the clock on the plane was slightly behind the one on the ground. Time had actually slowed down for the clock on the plane. It had travelled forward in time.




Couldnt it be that the one clock had a little malfunction? Maybe because of the flight and g-forces?

Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: capanno] #77808
06/15/06 17:52
06/15/06 17:52
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,321
Virginia, USA
Dan Silverman Offline
Senior Expert
Dan Silverman  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,321
Virginia, USA
Quote:

I mean the clock on the airplane could be slower because its pretty cold up there, and the colder it is the slower things go.




Quote:

Couldnt it be that the one clock had a little malfunction? Maybe because of the flight and g-forces?




No (on both accounts). The clock used was an atomic clock. Here is some information on atomic clocks:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/atomic-clock1.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock

The nature of an atomic clock is what would have caused Professor Alley to choose them for his experiment.


Professional 2D, 3D and Real-Time 3D Content Creation:
HyperGraph Studios
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: Dan Silverman] #77809
06/15/06 22:23
06/15/06 22:23
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
PHeMoX Offline
Senior Expert
PHeMoX  Offline
Senior Expert

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,177
Netherlands
How much time difference was this 'slightly behind'??

Quote:

Now, even creepier - say you are going the speed of light. Plug it into the equation: sqrt(1-1) = 0. 1 / 0 = undefined. Undefined = infinity. The universe has literally ended, an infinite amout of time has past - time becomes irrelevent to you.

Continuing, what would happen if you go beyond the speed of light? While this appears to a barrier in our universe, if you CAN go beyond it, the opposite would happen - time would slow down to a reverse.




While mathematically correct, I wonder if it's possible, to really reverse time ... It would mean 'past infinity and back within a year'? Sounds pretty creepy to me indeed. I also wonder how we could travel at those amazingly high speeds without getting teared apart because of the G-forces of acceleration. It would have to happen so fast that we either stay in one piece or don't notice the terrible amount of pain it causes... Would it be possible to create a ship that could fly at really really high speeds without causing much G-force trouble to a human? That and getting at light speed would be the first things to solve I think ....

Cheers

Last edited by PHeMoX; 06/15/06 22:30.

PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software
Re: Einstein's Relativity -> Paradoxes [Re: PHeMoX] #77810
06/16/06 00:25
06/16/06 00:25
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,813
U.S.
Nadester Offline OP

Expert
Nadester  Offline OP

Expert

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,813
U.S.
@Phemox, you can only feel a change in velocity, and thus the accleration would be the only problem. But whose to say you have to accelerate to the speed of light so fast that it is harmful to you? It doesn't matter as long as you get there.

@Capanno, pretty much what Dan said, but also the fact that this is supported mathematically, so it's no real surprise that the clocks were different.

@EX Citer, the speed that the planets move is nearly irrelevent compared to the speed of light. Similiarly, the difference in the speed of the sun and the speed of the planets is also quite irrelevent in comparison to the speed of light. (299,792,458 meters/sec) Still, time does move slower for us than for the sun, but the difference is so small that it's pretty much unnoticable.

Also, I forgot to mention, the process of time travel I stated above is known as time dialation, for anyone interested in further reading.


--Eric
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  jcl, Lukas, old_bill, Spirit 

Kompaktes Wïŋ―rterbuch des UnendlichenCompact Dictionary of the Infinite


Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1