No, no...I do not believe I claimed the signature was offensive.
(Of course, I'm not truly indicating that I really believe, you believe, I stated or implied the signature was offensive.)
Above I may have stated, hinted at, implied or derived some of the following:
*I might only be pseudo-sane.
*Evidently, I have some equally absurd, pent up, unresolved hostility towards a particular scripting language,
---but that is none of your business, so I mentioned here.
*Absurd statements might be:
---C-Script is exceedingly powerful, and extremely versatile. (lightly absurd)
---I can write a forum user implementation in C-Script alone. (absurdier on specification)
---I am a forum user, and I was completely written in C-Script. (and this, slays, mutilates and then posthumously copulates with the bird of absurdia)
++++++(Is possible with success? No? Faulty implementation suggested? Aye. Faulty user implied.)
>>>>>>>>>Reply 1: Ha ha ha. Very funny. lol, etc. (Why is the user insulting him or herself?)
>>>>>>>>>Reply 2: Warn user about perception. Ding ding.
Quote:
Honestly, it was just a bit of humor...
Although I didn't really care then, still don't now, and I don't think anyone else should care either, for no particular reason, at that specific moment in the past, I merely decided to mention that I thought that signature seemed to be a self-deprecative or self-denigrating expression.
Quote:
Honestly, it was just a bit of humor...
Quote:
I don't get it....