"TheExpert said, the demo left us without animations and physics in general"

Yeah the engine looks good like some other ones , but the level is too simple for my taste and to know if the engine can handle real gaming scene you need
to put animated meshes with shadows , together with grass/tree management, particle effects, distange management(LOD and other artifacts),
physics, panels all that together ...

Well enought talk, perhaps some people here will try / buy it and show us
some demo more complete one day ?

I'll come out from behind my smartaleck post above.

I averaged somewhere around 20-25 fps and it dipped into the teens with DOF and that one blur option enabled. The DOF seemed to be the culprit, though. I've got a 2.4ghz Pentium IV 512 RAM and a GeForce 7600 GS 512RAM. It did look cool, though, and it has a nice feature set. The price seems fair for what you're getting, but I'm guessing all of this can be done in good ol' 3DGS if you have the proper shaders (A6 or and esp. A7).

Our main concern is having it all handy dandy at our fingertips in some kind of easy to get at way. That's actually a very strong selling point, IMHO (you can't beat user friendly access). I guess that's what all the features being added to WED in recent updates is all about, though. You've gotta see the big picture and try and read Conitec's mind when it comes to this.

40 fps (high details)
With this 1 year old computer

All those shaders can be done in 3DGS, but 3DGS would run @ < 1 FPS

Have to agree with xXxGuitar511 and disagree with OrangeBrat (like always, sorry Brat). But this demo shows parallax mapping, projected textures, reflection, refraction, depth of field, real-time shadows, particles, volumetric fog and 500,000 polygons - all at the same time.

I checked a little corridor (a model no blocks) with a few hundret polygons and a simple 2-light-normal-map shader in Gamestudio and get less fps.

Check it out yourself. You cannot do this in GS.

TheExpert:
I checked some other demos of this engine and they show really impressive physics, animated robots walking correctly on top of a terrain, water with physical correctly swimming objects, tons of physics objects at the same time and much more.
This demo is quite slow because of 500,000 polygons and a dozen shaders working at the same time plus volumetric fog at the ground and real-time lighting.

Did you try to enable those flying fireballs in the demo? Look at the real-time shadows: soft, fast and no visual errors. This is amazing.

OK Frznk_G
if you say you've tested a demo on your PC with all you said ,
polygons, animated characters , physics alla running smoothly with
some shaders , than ok , the engine is really next gen efficient.

But we should also have such demo to test it.

Strane you say the temple scene have 500 000 ploys ?
i talk about the temple demo that is a simple room , simple 3D models with bump map and shaders ... i don't know if we can turn wireframe display to check this out ?

I know one AFTERFALL game project, that uses this Unigine game engine.



Description of Afterfall Game Engine

OK sorry Frank_G.

And the project using it , above your post , is animated models with
normal mapps it seems, shadaows, dynamic light ...
Well it seems Uningine is one among some other
complete Next Gen engine with all tools needed.