Shouldn't using 'continue' in a for loop terminate the current iteration and jump to it's increment expression? In LiteC it only terminates without incrementing. Anyone know anything about this? Am I right or wrong?
Re: continue in for loop
[Re: sheefo]
#146012 08/07/0713:2208/07/0713:22
I can live without defining variables in the for loop and I hope this 'continue' bug is fixed in the next version... I'll mention it in the public beta test topic.