my code can be freely used by everyone. please just don't take it 1:1 and claim that you wrote it yourself.

Quote:

---

It would have been a winner hands down if Newton Physics had implemented the Ragdoll, Player and Car examples along in it. But still, I find it to be a strong winner in this race. Nice use of Lite-C and an example of how to incorporate an externel dll into your code seamlessly.

---

i didn't have enough time to add more features so the demo just covers the basics (which somehow also is an advantage though because it's easier to get a clear overview) but more examples will come in the future.

hm... some of the entries seem to use a6 or the templates only. some of the lite-c demos are nice though! i already have a few favorites.

What are your favourites ?
mine are Worlds Forge and Entity viewer

Visual Level Editor by Alexey Rozhkov the best!
Ãîëocóåì ça Øåäoó)))
Ïðèâeò áóðæyÿì)))

Absolutely outstanding especially the tools, I just don't know how the judges will decide this time, it's a tough one. Congrats, some great contributions here.

Trooper119:

Quote:

---

I'm not sure if I missed something, but I was running through the demo's when I came to the leanmaster thing. I don't see anything other than 1 .exe file, and 2 .txt files, no code or anything, last time I checked, if you don't offer anything to learn from (the point of the contests) that was grounds for disqualification. The author should check this though.

---

AUM 66:

Quote:

---

- the demo(s) can be given freely to all the engine users and / or made available for free at Conitec's websites, or as GameStudio demos.

---

I sent the Leanmaster and the GUI Editor. They are both packed with nacasi.
In the Contest description of the last AUM (66) there's no mention of showing the source code.

And you can also learn from the other demos without looking at the source code....

Of course you can comprehend the demos better and learn better form them by reading the source code, but then this should be said in the contest description....

Can I have an official statement to that?
(disqualification?)

Dennis

Your right, I was remembering a past contest that specifically mentioned having to include the script file, because of the nature of the contest, this seems to be different, my fault good luck, I just didn't want you disqualified, but I should have double checked before posting.

Ive only gone thru 3 so far and they all are good
The packers take ages to load up for me so please include a line in future aboout the packer and approximate waiting time (no biggie, just thought to let you know from 1 users winge )

You don't have to include the source code (unless you really want to).

If its "Lite-C contest" then the code should be there. But I see that there are some demos that are using wdl code are also included in the contest. The purpose of the contest is to promote "Lite-C" and encourage its users to shift from wdl to Lite-C and learn from other peoples code examples. I think that only a few demos are fulfiling the requirements layed down for the contest correctly.

I propose that all the demos that are not upto the mark should be excluded from the contest, and only those that are fulfiling the requirements should be allowed to take part in the contest. If everybody agrees to it then some extra time should be given to the participants to implement the minimum requirements for the contest.

my favorite is Visual Level Editor by Alexey Rozhkov, nice work!


/|exa hpeBeä)