Where's the fun in damning an already pointless thread? Oh wait...

@ 1. thread spawn entity (assumed to be JulzMighty <- respected entity) or 2. other party (<-undef):
Do you have a strong a opinion pertaining to _
What do you think about _
What's your take on _
Why the choice of reference to _
What particular of _ really steams your vegetables
_ is orgas-ma-tastic for the following reasons

_ = thread.topic.14_deadly_sins

bad sample:
"I merely check to reassure myself.
No, fortunately, masturabation is still NOT classified as a deadly sin.
I thought others might want assurance also.
This service is a time shortcut.
Else entertainment purposes only.
Don't spoil the security 'oneness' vibe using Hilbert complexity infections like history, religion, archaic XX power thwarting conspiracies, pointless dusty book mutable persistence, mesmerism vs. word crusades for stereotypes & the faithfully ignorant, dummy wordful moronic eyesore injections, non-point defense via thread location by post type declarations..."

spam re-qualifier

bugger you're funny testDummy.

i don't really have a strong opinion pertaining to the new deadly sins. i really just wanted to be the first to let people know here

my girlfriend's Catholic (though not a very active one), and i find it really interesting how little she knows of Protestantism. she was surprised we have the same Bible, and as we do Bible-studies and go to church sermons taken straight out of the Bible she's starting to see that the biggest differences are the Catholic rituals that she doesn't do anyway.

as funny as it is, it's interesting that masturbation isn't a deadly sin. maybe they don't want most of their people getting their priests excited about masturbation during confession?

that's probably stretching it a bit.

julz